I have studied some archaeology, chemistry, art and some sociology. The recent protests against the "end of our planet" has issues that pertain to the basics of the "ancestors" of our planet and the "responsability" that was taken from them long ago.
In the need to let you know , there are problems in the pollution and economy that have followed every move of ancient and native peoples. |
image credit: public radio international.
Supporting climate change demonstrations and
the science and the fiction:
In reference to the pristene function of humans , we of every tribal genetic background , as the earth is today, together on the exposure of some facts about "what has been following " our human development behind us, for so long, making an impression that we do not sense. It is not until recently that global pollution has been following activities of global movements without being detected, This type of observation has been going on ever since the first man appeared but what are some of the clues to us being able to displace forwards and to have this ability to define "why we are the same"as those who felt this problem "following their own tribes and cultures ,even into civilization" the thing, people or energy that does this following as related to having the memory there but still being able to relate to it as our own biological intergration without definitions such as, "our memory takes us back, but we have no words for the past = the present and that is why the definition must be "unpresent".
A new word, unpresent, basically states that the ways that representation by rule over rule as the developed problem of climate change, the change of representation of that which is "following us" into the worlds climatic problems.
Juxtapose the word "unpresent"=presentun
or as "present until the end" as some function of how cultures and their anthropological and archaeological discoveries are being made in terms of the basic motion of areas of our forests and jungles being displaced for the functions of "economically heightened issues", whole areas are being lifted over their value of the problem to be known. No problem of climate is stationary, it lifts with the thermals the currents of air and displace over the response time we have to see the place in real time as the jungles are chopped down and needing to be there present, not "presentun".
So to refer to the functions of which of the references attributed to discrimination of native peoples as "red blooded" and as not having the ability to discern right from wrong in terms of the public responses needed for one native indian to effect the European as by way of some reference to how many people it takes for climate change to become an issue. The recent demonstrations of "climate change" are in reference to the "presentun= kid level " as the growth of the climate change movement equal to some hundred thousands to some millions and is growing. The basics are that the "presentun" is the value of one individual to bring shame on the "unpresent followers which we sense in our memory". What does it take to prove the opposite , that we will not forget as =equated to "presentun", as the "unpresent" as the new ways of thinking that do not need the interval of the representation of the "fictional contingency" that defines the unseen followers of our background as "-1 representation?.
As
presentun-1 or as unpresentun
and that the facts of the "red bloodedness" as another -1
defines the zero action that the "followers" are making as
= un zero present un
They pose that because their own bodies are still healthy and athletic that there is no cause to think about our own health because the " overly healthy " have the rule as their own. So it only with the "super healthy " who keep this secret of their " unknown following behind the natives". Our planet Earth is not a super fit, super healthy, super rich planet, to be able to afford another 10 generations of super healthy people when our planet is already well beyond healthy. The ideals of a healthy body when compared to earth today, is such a difference that to place the super fit as super secret in a line in front of a place in Bangladesh would show what is "following" us , because it is a barrier of interests.You can only have super healthy people in a world of super rich and super secret sides to the "obvious appearance of wasted money"and none of them are ever seen supporting the
climate change need. It's a dream that cannot be.
Most of the super rich in countries that have excessive pollution are people who buy up businesses and live their lifestyle without ever thinking about climate change in their approach to "big business", because they create a market for previous business that has already been shown to have damaging effects on the health of the planet. Look at the Earth and look at such "exclusivity" and you realize that which is "following us" to our end.
The unpresentun defines the facts that no serious (corrupt) business would ever show their products and process of it's economical gain as = "un presentable" in reference to other business that takes on such corruption, and so it goes un noticed as illegal secrecy. Because to make a success out of the "un presentable" they have to be "super secret" in every way possible wherever they use the secret media to "follow those who have no sense of being presentable".Meaning you, the kids.
more: To be able to chat the system ,these businesses of "non presentability" that they would go to the news and show their needs for more corrupt, polluting types of businesses is contrary to human discertion of wrong and right" and so they are bound with "illegal secrecy" to show another side, where they must have such great power that they can go totally undetected.
It's all about how people try to change the issue of the background to our ancient cultures. Here's an important article:
It's an excerpt.
see more at:
https://www.survivalinternational.org/articles/3435-the-ancestor-myth-why-todays-tribal-peoples-should-not-be-compared-to-our-ancestors
In 2012, the BBC produced an eight-part television series, ‘Andrew Marr’s History of the World’, presented by one of Britain’s best-known political journalists. It was followed by a book of the same title, and was due to be screened on the USA’s Discovery Channel in 2013.
In the opening seconds of the first film,1 Andrew Marr solemnly intones, ‘For thousands of years the Ayoreo tribe have lived in the forests of South America. They’re still leading much the same hunter-gatherer lifestyle as the very first humans on Earth.’ Andrew Marr wrote the script himself and probably thinks – I believe wrongly – that inserting the word ‘lifestyle’ softens his obvious meaning: the Ayoreo are much the same as prehistoric man was, tens of thousands of years ago. This hapless tribe in Paraguay was presumably chosen as an example of hunter-gatherers in general; Marr does at least accord them the merit of being ‘equally human’.
This opening remark is nonsense. Worse, it represents the doctrine which still underpins the destruction of tribal peoples and the theft of their territories and resources.
The same idea was used to justify Europe’s attempted and largely successful conquest of the rest of the world, as well as its slave trade. In this variant, the ‘white races’ (to which I, like Marr, belong) had supposedly advanced and were superior to others who had remained backward and primitive; they needed Europeans to lead them into the ‘modern world’, which ‘we’ had made and which belonged to us. History was on our side, not theirs. This gave us the right – indeed, the duty – to take their lands, resources, and labour, for they simply did not know how to use them properly. The evidence lay incontrovertibly before our eyes in the ruins of classical Athens and Rome, and was even eventually ‘proven’ by Darwinism.
Variations on this belief grew prevalent in Europe from the eighteenth century,2 and however strongly it still holds sway in popular consciousness, and with whatever varnish of political correctness it is painted, it remains a contrivance to explain and justify our inordinate and selfish exploitation of everyone else’s resources.
As applied to tribal peoples nowadays, the rationale goes like this: because the first humans are usually characterised as ‘hunter-gatherers’, it follows that twenty-first century peoples who are also ‘hunter-gatherers’ must live in broadly the same way. Andrew Marr’s film begins with this error, and proceeds to compound it, asserting that world history, indeed time itself, has somehow passed the Ayoreo by and that they only came ‘face to face with the twentieth century’ in 1998 (what century were they supposed to be living in?).
Here is the document that shows the facts that," the president" does not have any knowledge of. in terms of the "indians" and so it is illegal secrecy and "unacknowledged".In terms of the secrecy needed to have such a "need to know" the illegal secrecy must be on a very high level, indeed. The facts behind it show how such documents are related to the "pre ancient" origins of humans as " e.t" (extra terrestrial) and the facts that a billion levels above this type of document shown below reaches out into space , to other planets , to other civilizations and all because the "illegal secrecy" is tracing their own history to the source few people are even allowed to think of, "the direct et precence" in terms of the native "right and wrong" as the power use on peoples that have no sense of this division between each other as natives in the jungle.
The basics of the "unpresentun" is that they have created a portal between 2 of the most secret individuals in history so that the "illegal secrecy would go unnoticed" .
The facts of the "Mother Earth and her closure of the portal" by 3 vectors has already happened in the 90's.See the image of the portal as the "sirius crop circle" event that totally wishiated any abuse of "Mother Earth" to block it..
follow on with the "sirius disclosure movement" and the "unacknowledged projects from Steven Greer that have been in the forefront of "exposing this illegal secrecy" all the way back to the " right and wrong" as owned by the illegal secrecy and goes even "beyond this" to et technologies and methods they don't want you to "know" about.Because it shows that et civilizations have a higher "right and wrong" technological interaction with humans that could solve all our Earth problems in one generation.
Steven Greer is creating "right and wrong ways of knowledge of et contact with peaceful alien civilizations with the method that lets you do it with others or as alone.
image credit: documents doc teach
the science and the fiction:
In reference to the pristene function of humans , we of every tribal genetic background , as the earth is today, together on the exposure of some facts about "what has been following " our human development behind us, for so long, making an impression that we do not sense. It is not until recently that global pollution has been following activities of global movements without being detected, This type of observation has been going on ever since the first man appeared but what are some of the clues to us being able to displace forwards and to have this ability to define "why we are the same"as those who felt this problem "following their own tribes and cultures ,even into civilization" the thing, people or energy that does this following as related to having the memory there but still being able to relate to it as our own biological intergration without definitions such as, "our memory takes us back, but we have no words for the past = the present and that is why the definition must be "unpresent".
A new word, unpresent, basically states that the ways that representation by rule over rule as the developed problem of climate change, the change of representation of that which is "following us" into the worlds climatic problems.
Juxtapose the word "unpresent"=presentun
or as "present until the end" as some function of how cultures and their anthropological and archaeological discoveries are being made in terms of the basic motion of areas of our forests and jungles being displaced for the functions of "economically heightened issues", whole areas are being lifted over their value of the problem to be known. No problem of climate is stationary, it lifts with the thermals the currents of air and displace over the response time we have to see the place in real time as the jungles are chopped down and needing to be there present, not "presentun".
So to refer to the functions of which of the references attributed to discrimination of native peoples as "red blooded" and as not having the ability to discern right from wrong in terms of the public responses needed for one native indian to effect the European as by way of some reference to how many people it takes for climate change to become an issue. The recent demonstrations of "climate change" are in reference to the "presentun= kid level " as the growth of the climate change movement equal to some hundred thousands to some millions and is growing. The basics are that the "presentun" is the value of one individual to bring shame on the "unpresent followers which we sense in our memory". What does it take to prove the opposite , that we will not forget as =equated to "presentun", as the "unpresent" as the new ways of thinking that do not need the interval of the representation of the "fictional contingency" that defines the unseen followers of our background as "-1 representation?.
As
presentun-1 or as unpresentun
and that the facts of the "red bloodedness" as another -1
defines the zero action that the "followers" are making as
= un zero present un
They pose that because their own bodies are still healthy and athletic that there is no cause to think about our own health because the " overly healthy " have the rule as their own. So it only with the "super healthy " who keep this secret of their " unknown following behind the natives". Our planet Earth is not a super fit, super healthy, super rich planet, to be able to afford another 10 generations of super healthy people when our planet is already well beyond healthy. The ideals of a healthy body when compared to earth today, is such a difference that to place the super fit as super secret in a line in front of a place in Bangladesh would show what is "following" us , because it is a barrier of interests.You can only have super healthy people in a world of super rich and super secret sides to the "obvious appearance of wasted money"and none of them are ever seen supporting the
climate change need. It's a dream that cannot be.
Most of the super rich in countries that have excessive pollution are people who buy up businesses and live their lifestyle without ever thinking about climate change in their approach to "big business", because they create a market for previous business that has already been shown to have damaging effects on the health of the planet. Look at the Earth and look at such "exclusivity" and you realize that which is "following us" to our end.
The unpresentun defines the facts that no serious (corrupt) business would ever show their products and process of it's economical gain as = "un presentable" in reference to other business that takes on such corruption, and so it goes un noticed as illegal secrecy. Because to make a success out of the "un presentable" they have to be "super secret" in every way possible wherever they use the secret media to "follow those who have no sense of being presentable".Meaning you, the kids.
more: To be able to chat the system ,these businesses of "non presentability" that they would go to the news and show their needs for more corrupt, polluting types of businesses is contrary to human discertion of wrong and right" and so they are bound with "illegal secrecy" to show another side, where they must have such great power that they can go totally undetected.
It's all about how people try to change the issue of the background to our ancient cultures. Here's an important article:
It's an excerpt.
see more at:
https://www.survivalinternational.org/articles/3435-the-ancestor-myth-why-todays-tribal-peoples-should-not-be-compared-to-our-ancestors
In 2012, the BBC produced an eight-part television series, ‘Andrew Marr’s History of the World’, presented by one of Britain’s best-known political journalists. It was followed by a book of the same title, and was due to be screened on the USA’s Discovery Channel in 2013.
In the opening seconds of the first film,1 Andrew Marr solemnly intones, ‘For thousands of years the Ayoreo tribe have lived in the forests of South America. They’re still leading much the same hunter-gatherer lifestyle as the very first humans on Earth.’ Andrew Marr wrote the script himself and probably thinks – I believe wrongly – that inserting the word ‘lifestyle’ softens his obvious meaning: the Ayoreo are much the same as prehistoric man was, tens of thousands of years ago. This hapless tribe in Paraguay was presumably chosen as an example of hunter-gatherers in general; Marr does at least accord them the merit of being ‘equally human’.
This opening remark is nonsense. Worse, it represents the doctrine which still underpins the destruction of tribal peoples and the theft of their territories and resources.
The same idea was used to justify Europe’s attempted and largely successful conquest of the rest of the world, as well as its slave trade. In this variant, the ‘white races’ (to which I, like Marr, belong) had supposedly advanced and were superior to others who had remained backward and primitive; they needed Europeans to lead them into the ‘modern world’, which ‘we’ had made and which belonged to us. History was on our side, not theirs. This gave us the right – indeed, the duty – to take their lands, resources, and labour, for they simply did not know how to use them properly. The evidence lay incontrovertibly before our eyes in the ruins of classical Athens and Rome, and was even eventually ‘proven’ by Darwinism.
Variations on this belief grew prevalent in Europe from the eighteenth century,2 and however strongly it still holds sway in popular consciousness, and with whatever varnish of political correctness it is painted, it remains a contrivance to explain and justify our inordinate and selfish exploitation of everyone else’s resources.
As applied to tribal peoples nowadays, the rationale goes like this: because the first humans are usually characterised as ‘hunter-gatherers’, it follows that twenty-first century peoples who are also ‘hunter-gatherers’ must live in broadly the same way. Andrew Marr’s film begins with this error, and proceeds to compound it, asserting that world history, indeed time itself, has somehow passed the Ayoreo by and that they only came ‘face to face with the twentieth century’ in 1998 (what century were they supposed to be living in?).
Here is the document that shows the facts that," the president" does not have any knowledge of. in terms of the "indians" and so it is illegal secrecy and "unacknowledged".In terms of the secrecy needed to have such a "need to know" the illegal secrecy must be on a very high level, indeed. The facts behind it show how such documents are related to the "pre ancient" origins of humans as " e.t" (extra terrestrial) and the facts that a billion levels above this type of document shown below reaches out into space , to other planets , to other civilizations and all because the "illegal secrecy" is tracing their own history to the source few people are even allowed to think of, "the direct et precence" in terms of the native "right and wrong" as the power use on peoples that have no sense of this division between each other as natives in the jungle.
The basics of the "unpresentun" is that they have created a portal between 2 of the most secret individuals in history so that the "illegal secrecy would go unnoticed" .
The facts of the "Mother Earth and her closure of the portal" by 3 vectors has already happened in the 90's.See the image of the portal as the "sirius crop circle" event that totally wishiated any abuse of "Mother Earth" to block it..
follow on with the "sirius disclosure movement" and the "unacknowledged projects from Steven Greer that have been in the forefront of "exposing this illegal secrecy" all the way back to the " right and wrong" as owned by the illegal secrecy and goes even "beyond this" to et technologies and methods they don't want you to "know" about.Because it shows that et civilizations have a higher "right and wrong" technological interaction with humans that could solve all our Earth problems in one generation.
Steven Greer is creating "right and wrong ways of knowledge of et contact with peaceful alien civilizations with the method that lets you do it with others or as alone.
image credit: documents doc teach
The sirius crop circle event in the 90's created a barrier to the "natural portals of abuse" to mother earth.