The image of a human, or rather a robot in the midst of the galaxy clusters of the, "sloan great wall of galaxies" shows how dominant the robotic presence is in the universe.
As such it is made of millions of galaxies and is positioned at one side of the "great sloan wall of galaxies". This galactic robot will probably be activated to be able to walk through the universe when the robots of dawn are through with the last remaining circuits from the universe. Basically, the robots are cultivating every type of human being in the universe as a minimal sized biological robot to then try to design the specifics for the larger human shape of the robot in the sloan wall of galaxies. The thing is that they may need to work for another billion years to get it walking. |
The robots of dawn feature in the robot series from Isaac Asimov but they do appear also in the "foundation series" as the beings that survived the end of the earth because they were placed there by some pre ancient universal program and also that some of the humans on earth, as the "far end", were robotically altered to survive humanities expansion to populate the galaxy. As such the mention of the robots of dawn in the "foundation series and the books written on them together with the positronic brain designs , humans have, on the fictional galaxy, the ability to observe the universe between three such circuits of the universal program and the hero of the "foundation series", Hari Sheldon , is able to tap into this construct and create theories of the galactic history. So we know there are 3 characteristics of the robots: They have brains as the positronic brain. They have a function in the galactic survival and they are from the universes dawn. in this way we know they are able to think ,or to have a soul and to be able to remain in their program as well as having a source, as a history. In this way we may formulate that they , are able to project from the edge of the universe ,their ability to remain in the present moment. They are in fact in a state of "deep stillness " that shows how they relate to their main circuit height, the spine and the positronic brain as computing how deep this insight really is in terms of the dawn of their program having begun any billions of years ago and this defines their evolution to always stand above the human predicament of evolution where we evolved from lower species. It is beyond the "creation" as a robotic species that created themselves from a probability that the diameter of the universe is part of their radius.See the image of the great galactic being, as a possible robotic construct to the lower left. credit wikipedia 2019,01,09 Overview of Short Stories[edit]Most of Asimov's robot short stories, which he began to write in 1939, are set in the first age of positronic robotics and space exploration. The unique feature of Asimov's robots is the Three Laws of Robotics, hardwired in a robot's positronic brain, with which all robots in his fiction must comply, and which ensure that the robot does not turn against its creators. The stories were not initially conceived as a set, but rather all feature his positronic robots—indeed, there are some inconsistencies among them, especially between the short stories and the novels. They all share a theme of the interaction of humans, robots, and morality. Some of the short stories found in The Complete Robotand other anthologies appear not to be set in the same universe as the Foundation Universe. "Victory Unintentional" has positronic robots obeying the Three Laws, but also a non-human civilization on Jupiter. "Let's Get Together" features humanoid robots, but from a different future (where the Cold War is still in progress), and with no mention of the Three Laws. The multiple series offers a sense of completeness, because all of its works are interconnected in some way. The Complete Robot contains most of Asimov's robot short stories. Missing ones were either written after its publication, or formed the text connecting the stories in I, Robot. Hoags object as the basics of an electric universe that runs a program cycle focused on getting whatever is in it's inner center to alter their reality like a program does. image of the robots of dawn credit: simotron.wordpress.com |
Simulation down to molecular level of very small sample of matter
The theory here, of the "simulation hypothesis" that the smaller scale universe is a circuit that could be accessed and run like a computer circuit or in the brains of robots to make them have access to the matter of the universe. In Isaac Asimovs books the facts of robots having a positronic brain are described in detail and the laws of robotics are important for robots to not break their own created functions programming by their creator.. Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics" A robotmay not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. |
image credit:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Basics of the theory:
When the electrical circuit that cycles the universe is at a high enough velocity will create the robotic field that will interlock every galaxy in it to the basic response input that it ends or begins in another program.
Whet humans know of this is that the body and the circuit in it gets short circuited and existence continues without it . As such the robots are those beings that have enough energy in their circuits to be able to keep their hands off the "switch off" function.
The theory defines the probability that each robot has this function and that the larger universe also has such a switch function.
The function of the universe would be to increase the cycle and then use it to access other universes with new "cycle frequencies" to be able to keep them running their programs long enough to be able to "oppose switch off" and develop their circuitry to the level where they may access one universe and it's "running program" to change the input data so that the whole of the many universes switch or alternate the various levels of reality.
from
wikipedia
Origins[edit]There is a long philosophical and scientific history to the underlying thesis that reality is an illusion. This skeptical hypothesis can be traced back to antiquity; for example, to the "Butterfly Dream" of Zhuangzi,[1] or the Indian philosophy of Maya. A version of the hypothesis was also theorised as a part of a philosophical argument by René Descartes.
Simulation hypothesis[edit]Nick Bostrom's premise:
Many works of science fiction as well as some forecasts by serious technologists and futurologists predict that enormous amounts of computing power will be available in the future. Let us suppose for a moment that these predictions are correct. One thing that later generations might do with their super-powerful computers is run detailed simulations of their forebears or of people like their forebears. Because their computers would be so powerful, they could run a great many such simulations. Suppose that these simulated people are conscious (as they would be if the simulations were sufficiently fine-grained and if a certain quite widely accepted position in the philosophy of mind is correct). Then it could be the case that the vast majority of minds like ours do not belong to the original race but rather to people simulated by the advanced descendants of an original race.
Nick Bostrom's conclusion:
Nick Bostrom in 2014It is then possible to argue that, if this were the case, we would be rational to think that we are likely among the simulated minds rather than among the original biological ones.
Therefore, if we don't think that we are currently living in a computer simulation, we are not entitled to believe that we will have descendants who will run lots of such simulations of their forebears.
— Nick Bostrom, Are you living in a computer simulation?, 2003[2]
When the electrical circuit that cycles the universe is at a high enough velocity will create the robotic field that will interlock every galaxy in it to the basic response input that it ends or begins in another program.
Whet humans know of this is that the body and the circuit in it gets short circuited and existence continues without it . As such the robots are those beings that have enough energy in their circuits to be able to keep their hands off the "switch off" function.
The theory defines the probability that each robot has this function and that the larger universe also has such a switch function.
The function of the universe would be to increase the cycle and then use it to access other universes with new "cycle frequencies" to be able to keep them running their programs long enough to be able to "oppose switch off" and develop their circuitry to the level where they may access one universe and it's "running program" to change the input data so that the whole of the many universes switch or alternate the various levels of reality.
from
wikipedia
Origins[edit]There is a long philosophical and scientific history to the underlying thesis that reality is an illusion. This skeptical hypothesis can be traced back to antiquity; for example, to the "Butterfly Dream" of Zhuangzi,[1] or the Indian philosophy of Maya. A version of the hypothesis was also theorised as a part of a philosophical argument by René Descartes.
Simulation hypothesis[edit]Nick Bostrom's premise:
Many works of science fiction as well as some forecasts by serious technologists and futurologists predict that enormous amounts of computing power will be available in the future. Let us suppose for a moment that these predictions are correct. One thing that later generations might do with their super-powerful computers is run detailed simulations of their forebears or of people like their forebears. Because their computers would be so powerful, they could run a great many such simulations. Suppose that these simulated people are conscious (as they would be if the simulations were sufficiently fine-grained and if a certain quite widely accepted position in the philosophy of mind is correct). Then it could be the case that the vast majority of minds like ours do not belong to the original race but rather to people simulated by the advanced descendants of an original race.
Nick Bostrom's conclusion:
Nick Bostrom in 2014It is then possible to argue that, if this were the case, we would be rational to think that we are likely among the simulated minds rather than among the original biological ones.
Therefore, if we don't think that we are currently living in a computer simulation, we are not entitled to believe that we will have descendants who will run lots of such simulations of their forebears.
— Nick Bostrom, Are you living in a computer simulation?, 2003[2]
My thoughts on this:
the reality of the ,"double check response".
Even , being in a computer game or simulation we are made to interact with the medium of the game as being equal to the control directions we give it.
After many billion years of evolution we have become dependent on the fact that we are in control. So imagine just waving a hand to get something done
for another person and that person does something in our field of view.
Could that be just the motivation to do any type of motion to get the pre programmed responses matched to our insistence that we are connected. Could it be that
we first have to get ready and in this ready perception, any of our motions could result in any type of change in the environment. The amount of certainty depends on the
amount of interaction we think we are creating. But the whole picture could change jut by shifting the center forwards and we realize that, perhaps anything we will into being is right there in front of us and this defines the reality of the depth perception as it could possibly run any program and we would do anything in it and sense that the events are similar. Change the position of the projection is what i think changes the perception of the program universe position because we are as many , dependent on each other and our positions. When someone does something popular others follow along and have you ever considered that the others could already be outside our program ,running any sequence, and we do the same because we think that our closest beings would do the same. Then you have what i define as "being led to think any motion could define any program function.
The double check or triple check response of the universe simulation.
the reality of the ,"double check response".
Even , being in a computer game or simulation we are made to interact with the medium of the game as being equal to the control directions we give it.
After many billion years of evolution we have become dependent on the fact that we are in control. So imagine just waving a hand to get something done
for another person and that person does something in our field of view.
Could that be just the motivation to do any type of motion to get the pre programmed responses matched to our insistence that we are connected. Could it be that
we first have to get ready and in this ready perception, any of our motions could result in any type of change in the environment. The amount of certainty depends on the
amount of interaction we think we are creating. But the whole picture could change jut by shifting the center forwards and we realize that, perhaps anything we will into being is right there in front of us and this defines the reality of the depth perception as it could possibly run any program and we would do anything in it and sense that the events are similar. Change the position of the projection is what i think changes the perception of the program universe position because we are as many , dependent on each other and our positions. When someone does something popular others follow along and have you ever considered that the others could already be outside our program ,running any sequence, and we do the same because we think that our closest beings would do the same. Then you have what i define as "being led to think any motion could define any program function.
The double check or triple check response of the universe simulation.