MYTH and REALITY
about the Kurgan and goddess conflict and
possible explanations of the way that thought
developed in ancient Europe and why much
is unknown beyond the GODDESS TRADITIONS
because the memory ends somewhere between
5000 and 4000 BC long before it appears..
In Magic this is known as the past present or present past(see MERLIN ,Wizard)
by Henryk Szubinski
Archaeology ,fiction, myth and prehistory and MAGIC.
about the Kurgan and goddess conflict and
possible explanations of the way that thought
developed in ancient Europe and why much
is unknown beyond the GODDESS TRADITIONS
because the memory ends somewhere between
5000 and 4000 BC long before it appears..
In Magic this is known as the past present or present past(see MERLIN ,Wizard)
by Henryk Szubinski
Archaeology ,fiction, myth and prehistory and MAGIC.
more:
That the Neanderthal disappeared may be due to the last of them being part of the ARROW CULT. Their survival was based on the ARROW as faster in cold weather than the usage of Swords. It could avoid any disease of carriers of disease by long distances over which the arrow could displace.
But there was another probability that they believed that their future offspring would have the ability to change their FOREFATHERS ORIGINS, simply by FOCUS of the mid or pre frontal that characterized their appearance with the protruding fore head.
Meaning that they also believed in mother Earth or mother nature to the point where their ability to focus the arrow over long distances gave them the ability to "totally alter their DNA" of their past into a totally new DNA species ,simply by the FOCUS of the MIND OVER LONG distances that made them able, together with the harsh cold as the element of pre historic magic, to focus the displacement of the arrow head , by mind and body projection but also by inner DNA changes. So to find the DNA and apply this ARROW of time to it by triangulation of the -TC temperature x S (displacement) and m (point focus) as the only prerequisites for the GENOME and ABILITY TO EVOLVE by using the FOCUS of the MIND.
from Wikipedia
date 2018
May 3
goddess is a female deity.[1] Goddesses have been linked with virtues such as beauty, love, motherhood and fertility (Mother-goddess cult in prehistoric times). They have also been associated with ideas such as war, creation, and death.
In some faiths, a sacred female figure holds a central place in religious prayer and worship. For example, Shaktism, the worship of the female force that animates the world, is one of the three major sects of Hinduism. In Tibetan Buddhism, the highest advancement any person can achieve is to become like the great female Buddhas (e.g. Arya Tara), who are depicted as supreme protectors, fearless and filled with compassion for all beings.
The primacy of a monotheistic or near-monotheistic "Great Goddess" is advocated by some modern matriarchists as a female version of, preceding, or analogue to, the Abrahamic God associated with the historical rise of monotheism in the Mediterranean Axis Age.
Polytheist religions, including Polytheistic reconstructionists, honour multiple goddesses and gods, and usually view them as discrete, separate beings. These deities may be part of a pantheon, or different regions may have tutelary deities. The reconstructionists, like their ancient forebears, honour the deities particular to their country of origin.
Dry stone walls appear throughout Europe and may be the traces of earlier much older walls built by the Kurgan (see explanation of the Kurgan below).
THE GODDESS TRADITIONS and some of the REPRESENTATIONS of her.
from Wikipedia
date 2018
May 3
time, 18:15
Diana (Classical Latin: [dɪˈaː.na]) was the goddess of the hunt, the moon, and nature in Roman mythology, associated with wild animals and woodland, and having the power to talk to and control animals. She was equated with the Greek goddess Artemis,[1] though she had an independent origin in Italy.
Diana was known as the virgin goddess of childbirth and women. She was one of the three maiden goddesses, along with Minerva and Vesta, who swore never to marry. Oak groves and deer were especially sacred to her. Diana was born with her twin brother, Apollo, on the island of Delos, daughter of Jupiter and Latona. She made up a triad with two other Roman deities; Egeria the water nymph, her servant and assistant midwife; and Virbius, the woodland god.[2]
Diana is revered in Roman Neopaganism and Stregheria.
The KURGANS were known for their SKY GODS and also their ability to define concept in Squares as their way of thinking in terms of "dry stone walls". in greater amounts cognitively, than any other of the early primates that developed into humans. Somewhere the SKY GODS and the Early European tribes went their separate ways.
The KURGANS were definitely the threat against the Early goddess Huntress who used the BOW and Arrow earlier on in prehistory of Europe than any other humans.
That the way to make it in evolutionary terms ,meant that early goddess ,must have had some ability to sense the DEPTH of the environment as the first thought of the world we are in , developed in the minds and perception of the goddess.
Not every "dry stone wall" is from the times of it's first appearance in ancient times.Few remain and most of the stones were probably collected by the Hunter gatherers in the period of Europe where the stones were collected into heaps of rock that now appear as KURGANS , meaning, " the burial places of the ancient European memory.
The mounds shaped in this way, were named "KURGANS" and define the ancient burial mounds of the early problems of Europe and the invasions of the KURGAN warriors.
The Kurgan warrior as the main problem of the early goddess traditions living in peace and harmony.
Their developments of swords early on at the time when the goddess had developed the bow and arrow.
So the Dry stone walls may be said to represent the KURGAN SWORD as it displaces towards the
horizon and meets the sky , into the cognitive realm of the Kurgans who actually used this way of thinking,
known as the "GEOMANTIC MEMORY" where cognition was classed into various sections of their brain
model of thinking in categories of squares in the whole of
Europe being made into what early goddess defined as , "LEI LINES".
from Wikipedia
date 2018
may 3
time, 17:58
The Kurgan hypothesis (also known as the Kurgan theory or Kurgan model) or steppe theory is the most widely accepted proposal to identify the Proto-Indo-European homeland from which the Indo-European languages spread out throughout Europe and parts of Asia.[note 1] It postulates that the people of a Kurgan culture in the Pontic steppe north of the Black Sea were the most likely speakers of the Proto-Indo-European language (PIE). The term is derived from the Russian kurgan (курган), meaning tumulus or burial mound.
The Kurgan hypothesis was first formulated in the 1950s by Marija Gimbutas, who used the term to group various cultures, including the Yamna, or Pit Grave, culture and its predecessors. David Anthony instead uses the core Yamna culture and its relationship with other cultures as a point of reference.
Marija Gimbutas defined the Kurgan culture as composed of four successive periods, with the earliest (Kurgan I) including the Samara and Seroglazovo cultures of the Dnieper-Volga region in the Copper Age (early 4th millennium BC). The people of these cultures were nomadic pastoralists, who, according to the model, by the early 3rd millennium BC had expanded throughout the Pontic-Caspian steppe and into Eastern Europe.[3]
Three genetic studies in 2015 gave partial support to Gimbutas's Kurgan theory regarding the Indo-European Urheimat. According to those studies, haplogroups R1b and R1a, now the most common in Europe (R1a is also common in South Asia) would have expanded from the Russian and Ukrainian steppes, along with the Indo-European languages; they also detected an autosomal component present in modern Europeans which was not present in Neolithic Europeans, which would have been introduced with paternal lineages R1b and R1a, as well as Indo-European languages.[4][5][6]
Invasion vs. diffusion scenarios[edit]Gimbutas believed that the expansions of the Kurgan culture were a series of essentially hostile, military incursions where a new warrior culture imposed itself on the peaceful, matrilinear (hereditary through the female line), matrifocal, though egalitarian cultures of "Old Europe", replacing it with a patriarchal warrior society,[21] a process visible in the appearance of fortified settlements and hillforts and the graves of warrior-chieftains:
The process of Indo-Europeanization was a cultural, not a physical, transformation. It must be understood as a military victory in terms of successfully imposing a new administrative system, language, and religion upon the indigenous groups.[22]
In her later life, Gimbutas increasingly emphasized the authoritarian nature of this transition from the egalitarian process of the "nature/Gaia" Mother Goddess to a patriarchal society and the worship of the patristic / father / sun / weather God (Zeus, Dyaus). Contrary to several critics'[who?] opinions, matriarchal hierarchical structures in Gimbutas' opinion are the same as a patriarchal society, not the actual opposite: an egalitarian society without hierarchy.
J. P. Mallory (in 1989) accepted the Kurgan hypothesis as the de facto standard theory of Indo-European origins, but he recognized criticism of any alleged, but not actually stated (the slow accumulation of influence through coecerion or extortion – Gimbutas' actual main scenario – was often taken as general and immediate raiding and then conquest) "radical" scenario of military invasion:
One might at first imagine that the economy of argument involved with the Kurgan solution should oblige us to accept it outright. But critics do exist and their objections can be summarized quite simply: Almost all of the arguments for invasion and cultural transformations are far better explained without reference to Kurgan expansions, and most of the evidence so far presented is either totally contradicted by other evidence, or is the result of gross misinterpretation of the cultural history of Eastern, Central, and Northern Europe.[23]
The Burial mounds that were probably made with the collected stones of the early DRY STONE WALLS in the area and which are related to the period when the farmer traditions were left to exist on their own without the KURGAN WARRIOR in this period of history.
The Kurgan probably gave up his plans and focused his attention on the remaining few Farmers who were the cause of this diversion as they developed the ways of metallurgy.
The Kurgan probably gave up his plans and focused his attention on the remaining few Farmers who were the cause of this diversion as they developed the ways of metallurgy.
from Wikipedia
date 2018
Merlin (Welsh: Myrddin) is a legendary Welsh figure best known as the wizard or warlock featured in Arthurian legend and medieval Welsh poetry. The standard depiction of the character first appears in Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae, written c. 1136, and is based on an amalgamation of previous historical and legendary figures. Geoffrey combined existing stories of Myrddin Wyllt (Merlinus Caledonensis), a North Brythonic prophet and madman with no connection to King Arthur, with tales of the Romano-British war leader Ambrosius Aurelianus to form the composite figure he called Merlin Ambrosius (Welsh: Myrddin Emrys). He is allegedly buried in the Broceliande forest, near Paimpont in Brittany.
Geoffrey's rendering of the character was immediately popular, especially in Wales.[1] Later writers expanded the account to produce a fuller image of the wizard. Merlin's traditional biography casts him as a cambion: born of a mortal woman, sired by an incubus, the non-human from whom he inherits his supernatural powers and abilities.[2] Merlin matures to an ascendant sagehood and engineers the birth of Arthur through magic and intrigue.[3] Later authors have Merlin serve as the king's advisor and mentor to the knights until he is bewitched and imprisoned by the Lady of the Lake.[3]
So in the stories and myths about the WIZARD, MERLIN is most prominent but , there are no longer any squares in the stories. No recollections of the farmers fields or the mention of any farmers as characters. There are maybe some mentions of the hunter gatherers as the GATHERINGS of MAGIC and the way that applied skills in hunting were considered something positive at the time when the forests were larger ,unexplored areas and the way that myth explains the "FORREST WILD MAN" as Merlin and probably the facts that most magic creatures had taken it to them, to become hunters or gatherers.
Like in some fairy tale world between the beginnings of the metal age or somewhere, where the knowledge of metallurgy becomes mixed with magic and the secrets of the squares become the hold of power for KING ARTHUR who builds his Camelot here with the help of MERLIN and the DRAGONS lay in sleep beneath it's rocky "MOUND",
similar to the MOUNDS of ancient burials.
So it may be that the age of MERLIN was about the last remaining hold on the SQUARE that defines the CASTLE and the fact that MERLIN did either protect it or made it known that such squares would be the ownership of Kings like king Arthur by way of hereditary rule and ownership.
The shields of the nights of the round table show that at this time, squares and farming are not so important as the new development of the CIRCULAR shapes and their new methods of expressing history and memory in terms of the STONEHENGE and other MONOLITHIC structures where the circular shape was prominent.
Like in some fairy tale world between the beginnings of the metal age or somewhere, where the knowledge of metallurgy becomes mixed with magic and the secrets of the squares become the hold of power for KING ARTHUR who builds his Camelot here with the help of MERLIN and the DRAGONS lay in sleep beneath it's rocky "MOUND",
similar to the MOUNDS of ancient burials.
So it may be that the age of MERLIN was about the last remaining hold on the SQUARE that defines the CASTLE and the fact that MERLIN did either protect it or made it known that such squares would be the ownership of Kings like king Arthur by way of hereditary rule and ownership.
The shields of the nights of the round table show that at this time, squares and farming are not so important as the new development of the CIRCULAR shapes and their new methods of expressing history and memory in terms of the STONEHENGE and other MONOLITHIC structures where the circular shape was prominent.
The parallel between the Nights of the round table and the STONEHENGE.
As well as the SHIELDS of the Knights of the round table being somewhat like
triangles, that would have developed as the shape of magic by way of the
change from the square ,as the farmers symbol to the symbol of magic as the
triangle that protected the magicians and also could be redefined as higher magic
by it's reference to the STONEHENGE and the position in relation to other shields or
triangles that protect the inner WIZARDS SOURCE. Remembering that at this time
there were no geometrical ways to calculate the angle that a shield would be on
in reference to the STONEHENGE or the shields as triangles.
However, the traditions of the Moon were strong in magic of the old ways as the
remaining goddess traditions define it as the gradual curvature of the way that
they could avoid being trapped by the Kurgan concept of the DRY STONE WALLS and their
projections to the horizon ,so as to keep them in.
So then the Moon became the first real magic of the way to not only avoid the new ways of magic, but also to have the knowledge of the first ways to define the angle of the Moon in space as
it's fazes and the first of the ancient European ways to define dates of various GODDESS
worship.
So then, the symbol of the nights of the round table were also the positions of the moon in it's fazes and were arranged so to show the various powers of magic, king Arthur and Merlin as the center of it.
As well as the SHIELDS of the Knights of the round table being somewhat like
triangles, that would have developed as the shape of magic by way of the
change from the square ,as the farmers symbol to the symbol of magic as the
triangle that protected the magicians and also could be redefined as higher magic
by it's reference to the STONEHENGE and the position in relation to other shields or
triangles that protect the inner WIZARDS SOURCE. Remembering that at this time
there were no geometrical ways to calculate the angle that a shield would be on
in reference to the STONEHENGE or the shields as triangles.
However, the traditions of the Moon were strong in magic of the old ways as the
remaining goddess traditions define it as the gradual curvature of the way that
they could avoid being trapped by the Kurgan concept of the DRY STONE WALLS and their
projections to the horizon ,so as to keep them in.
So then the Moon became the first real magic of the way to not only avoid the new ways of magic, but also to have the knowledge of the first ways to define the angle of the Moon in space as
it's fazes and the first of the ancient European ways to define dates of various GODDESS
worship.
So then, the symbol of the nights of the round table were also the positions of the moon in it's fazes and were arranged so to show the various powers of magic, king Arthur and Merlin as the center of it.