QUESTIONS and ANSWERS
on Newtonian motivations
by Henryk Szubinski
On the basis of Isaac Newton having so much done in least amount of time together with Volitaire ,published more than 2000 books ,at the time at the turn of the end of the 16 th century, i suggest the presence of a large library or volumes of symbolical information that was so large that it rivaled even the library of Alexandria.
The basis of this knowledge, i think would be related to sociological models for human interaction and it's symbolism of interaction. Ethics by way of medicine was being developed as well as Benedict de Spinoza and axioms ( could be the source of the Alchemy symbolism, published ; Ethics ,1677) . Aristotle (384 – 322 BC) and Ethics would also be popular at the turn of the 16 th century. So on this basis then, the symbolism was known as Alchemy of which Newton was known to engage in regularly. The only basis i know of ,that there would be sociology at the time would depend on the discovery of role models that were previously unknown. The only such event could be the equality of women's rights that showed it's hidden role of the nature nurture as did the method of Socrates to wander around Athens and giving questions to the populace on the streets. So there had to exist something just as obvious in the sociologically obvious 3rd point of view of people in the throng of old cities. The ability to observe and to assign symbols to those observations without being totally involved with them , could be the reasons for the new language of ancient sources of the nature, nurture role and the women's liberal movements. So accordingly just like "The rights of man " was published by Thomas Paine there must have been a very large amount of doodles of a new language that Newton assigned to going around and asking questions until the answer was found. It depended on your approach .So the language could be the same but the opportunists could get results due to the random choice effect of approaching people and getting real answers as the 1/500 000 as the chance event of knowing the answer to every question from the available information in society.
There would have to be sociological images ,that were like small symbols that represented meetings between people and their emotional content as well as their relational values and the time line of such cartoons. That the Descarte's approach was based on the separation from Newtonian thought at the alternate side of protestant ideas and developed into the German School of "mind separated from body" and as such the beginnings of psychology. This move must have had the large basis of sociological symbolism that Newton defines as Alchemy and the alternate side known as "abstracted recordings" of the small glyphs , that resembled the ancient Greek , the ancient hieroglyphs and Maya ,considering that Maya had been discovered about 200 to 300 years previously and would be very popular in Europe.
The age of reason then, would be the time when meetings between people everywhere would have the language of civilized interaction. Meaning that one persons questiuon to another such as " How are you doing ? " = "Thank you ,very well". Could never be the opposite, otherwise the thought would not have become real. So to based on this certainty of responses and sociology, the scientific approach could be the same between scientist with the motivation to get more of these questions and answers right because at some time they will be so many that it could only benefit the scientists who use their language. As such Isaac Newton would have pioneered this language and found the reasons why, approaches between people asking questions and giving answers would opt for the best and fastest response.
The Alchemical example of symbolism above and the sociological below. As the time of Spinoza,Newton,Volitaire as separating from the basic relationships based on religeon and making whole libraries of symbolism that developed the INTEGRAL CALCULUS (to know what type of human relationships would develop by other human relationships)
You can see here how the enclosure of the symbol above as the Euclidean enclosure goes to the alternate side of total freedom (shown below). So what happens is that the
geometry of the room exchanges the Newtonian freedom with the German "non mind body" Descartes and then back again as the early psychology separation from Volitaire and Newton as the method of deniability of the mind body connection.This exchange could be defined by the dynamics of the sum total resulting from the change on either side and the opposite dynamics change on the other side (basic Archimedes principle).As related to the visual apparatus and the observer theory;
You might be interested in the Pupilus Universalis from the Polish model of the first Democracy in Europe and the model for many European governments as the freedom to observe.
You can see here how the enclosure of the symbol above as the Euclidean enclosure goes to the alternate side of total freedom (shown below). So what happens is that the
geometry of the room exchanges the Newtonian freedom with the German "non mind body" Descartes and then back again as the early psychology separation from Volitaire and Newton as the method of deniability of the mind body connection.This exchange could be defined by the dynamics of the sum total resulting from the change on either side and the opposite dynamics change on the other side (basic Archimedes principle).As related to the visual apparatus and the observer theory;
You might be interested in the Pupilus Universalis from the Polish model of the first Democracy in Europe and the model for many European governments as the freedom to observe.