dark matter and dark energy as lens problems.
scifi science by Henryk Szubinski
There are lenses that are in use or have been in use that have the polarization of the blue light into the red spectrum.
Also some of them may be using red filters for the observation of blue light.
Other problems may be that the red filters on lenses are altering the view of the blue shift towards us and that
blue filter lenses are altering the light when observing red shifted light moving away from us.
Some other pointers are that the use of the glass in the advanced lenses may be shifted to the red spectrum
and may also be the case where lenses and their glass density are referenced to the blue spectrum as approaching.
The basics of the glass in usage for the optics may be in a gap of light recognition that involves the "focus" speed
of the glass as corrupted by red shift or blue shift. Other problems involved with the sharpness of the lens and the dispersal
of the glass as being "sharp in the red spectrum".
Some other problems involve the facts that glass used for optimal performance lenses are in the pink shift of the pink light
meaning that the amount of red shift filtered through them is in reduced glass density , but have some shadow effect when
the light is translated into the clarity of the strings that flow through the lens. There is a basic "clott" effect of the strings being
collected in the translator of the light. Such shadows may be in may layers and display depth of spacial dimensionality when
there is none. The facts of the pink spectrum is that the heat needed to produce lenses actually absorbs some of the heat
and this is present in the glass as the structure of the glass as it has been cooled to produce the lens structure. In this way
the directionality of the lensing structure should be made so that each particle in the glass structure is rotated into a dial
function. Meaning that electronic lenses could arrange their point "receivers" into rotatable points so that in the whole each
particle is in programmable motion of rotation as the whole lens focuses rather than the light going into the lens. So in this
way the collective minature type robots as particles of the lans structure could simulate an opening for the light by way of
the whole moving in synch to create the "dial" that then will be in the true red shift as the light escaping the lens structure would be
visable as moving away from the opening in the digital lens opening and that this red shift could be made to register the yellow
spectrum of our sun on the periphery of vision so as to make the image vertical as the 10 x 20 image. To rotate this capture
of the red shift with the lens particles mans that the rotation of the star being observed ,could be observed while the lens opening
is itself in rotation to follow the red light shift and the degrees of the red as it changes to the pink or the yellow.
image credit
nasa
The ghost light from distant galaxies are actually the "dark matter" and the light of the dark energy".
But in terms of the blue shift being observed, the lensing may be focused to the advantage of the
red shifted lens.
We will not know unless the way that lenses are made changes, and the backyard observer of the night sky
gets the telescope that forever changes that persons view of the universe .
It's just the way it is. Current mirrors and the polishing of them to get it right to the billion part degree will
not always be true because they would only reflect by their curvature, the opposite to the lens function .
Lets say that the mirror is convex and that the light hitting it is from a lens that is concave, the 2 opposites do
not cancel each other rather the lens as red shift may change to the mirror as blue shift and the image shows no
evidence for the dark matter or dark energy.
Consider that Stephen Hawking's was trying to define the lens system that has no concave or convex involvement in the
alpha expansion =convex
of light as in the beta contraction of light in the concave as may seem to be gravity anomalies caught int he lensing.
And that the way to oppose the concavity by way of the rotation of light as it expands by a higher rate than the convex side
means that the reduction of rotation into the concave side has to be equated to the sum of the rotations as zero gravity.
Meaning that to oppose this zero gravity as used in the Hubble telescope would mean to use the functions for the convex
and concave as unified together into a "non curvature" variance of the way that the universe appears to have zero lensing
= the observation of space and that the longer the reference to other planets like our own,in the star systems where the
facts of curvature are +- of the light so that the universe may appear as it truly is, meaning it has the receptive functions
that our eyes have.
How to define the problem in 1 sentence?.
That the sun casts it's light on the bright side of Earth so that our body has 1 shadow while this shadow is similar to the
shadow of the Earth's night side and this casts the shadow into the space behind it.
So there you have it, there are 3 shadows in reference to the day side, but only the 1 shadow of the observer on the
Sun's side.
So off course when the galaxy conserves the energy of light, it has to be on the side of the 1 light that the observer sees
with the 1 shadow of the observer as his or her position on Earth.
It is this 1:1 ratio of the center of the galaxy that defines the conservation of the light of the Sun being observed as 1 light
and the light from the galaxy core as the other light center.
You cannot have 3 shadows in reference to light because in triangulation we use 3 points of light as the ancient navigators
used them to define their positions, you cannot use shadows at night to relate to other shadows unless you know that the
light is on the opposite side of the planet.
The center of the galaxy as the 1 light of the galaxy cannot be outdone by shadows. The center of the galaxy is faster,
much faster in displacing light than it is with shadows being in displacement. So the day side of Earth will always face the
bright center of the galaxy wherever the planet is located in the 360 degrees vies of the 360 degrees of the inner galaxy
center. So the 360: 360 ratio= the 1:1 ratio.
Had you cast yourself out of the night ,into space and moved into the Earth's shadow you would be pulled into the galaxy
gravity center , not the other way round and so too does the light get pulled to the galaxy core as soon as it is reflected from
Earth. The observer moving in the shadow to find it's point where it would displace to, would only be moving outwards to the
space seen in the above image, and as such into empty space and space has no light where there is only shadow. So as you
observe the Sun getting smaller, the effect is to observe the galaxy center as being smaller, and this defines the fact that
the observer is still exposed to the light from the center of the galaxy, the light of the Sun and the light on the observers body.
So those are the 3 points of light as c1,c2,c3
and exist wherever there is space as the ratio of 1 related to the product of the
c1xc2xc3=
729 c
as the ratio of the 1:1
of the
c1 and c2
and the ratio 1:1
of the
c2 and c3.
This was known in every advanced civilization as the facts of the light being there first and that the shadows of the planets and
the light that causes them is related to the center.So there are 3 ratio's of the conservation of light as it belongs to the galaxy
center.
(1:1), (c1:c2) , (c2:c3)
Multiply the left and then the right
and you get the :
4c:36c
which is the multiple system 10 of the 360 degrees with the 40c
So the ratio expands as the light does so into:
40c:3600c
on the scale of the 12 billion light years of the universe, the ratio is
4 000 000 000 : 36 000 000 000
So it has width as the limit of the 12 billion is close to the volume of 3 of it's sides as 12 +12+12
on the super universe scale the definition of the 4 billion shorter side is equal to the 10 multiple.
of
40 000 000 000: 360 000 000 000
So it has
4+4+4+4+4+4+4+4+4+4 as the multiple of the 10 sides of it's measure beyond the present stage where the 12+12+12
may be localized before the great expansion.
as the universe ratio of light conservation that always faces the Sun or galaxy center as too does the Suns brightness face the galaxy brightness
as enveloped in universe pre history as the rotation around the Sun to the side that faces the galaxy center but also to rotate around the galaxy center
to find it facing other brighter galaxies.
But in terms of the blue shift being observed, the lensing may be focused to the advantage of the
red shifted lens.
We will not know unless the way that lenses are made changes, and the backyard observer of the night sky
gets the telescope that forever changes that persons view of the universe .
It's just the way it is. Current mirrors and the polishing of them to get it right to the billion part degree will
not always be true because they would only reflect by their curvature, the opposite to the lens function .
Lets say that the mirror is convex and that the light hitting it is from a lens that is concave, the 2 opposites do
not cancel each other rather the lens as red shift may change to the mirror as blue shift and the image shows no
evidence for the dark matter or dark energy.
Consider that Stephen Hawking's was trying to define the lens system that has no concave or convex involvement in the
alpha expansion =convex
of light as in the beta contraction of light in the concave as may seem to be gravity anomalies caught int he lensing.
And that the way to oppose the concavity by way of the rotation of light as it expands by a higher rate than the convex side
means that the reduction of rotation into the concave side has to be equated to the sum of the rotations as zero gravity.
Meaning that to oppose this zero gravity as used in the Hubble telescope would mean to use the functions for the convex
and concave as unified together into a "non curvature" variance of the way that the universe appears to have zero lensing
= the observation of space and that the longer the reference to other planets like our own,in the star systems where the
facts of curvature are +- of the light so that the universe may appear as it truly is, meaning it has the receptive functions
that our eyes have.
How to define the problem in 1 sentence?.
That the sun casts it's light on the bright side of Earth so that our body has 1 shadow while this shadow is similar to the
shadow of the Earth's night side and this casts the shadow into the space behind it.
So there you have it, there are 3 shadows in reference to the day side, but only the 1 shadow of the observer on the
Sun's side.
So off course when the galaxy conserves the energy of light, it has to be on the side of the 1 light that the observer sees
with the 1 shadow of the observer as his or her position on Earth.
It is this 1:1 ratio of the center of the galaxy that defines the conservation of the light of the Sun being observed as 1 light
and the light from the galaxy core as the other light center.
You cannot have 3 shadows in reference to light because in triangulation we use 3 points of light as the ancient navigators
used them to define their positions, you cannot use shadows at night to relate to other shadows unless you know that the
light is on the opposite side of the planet.
The center of the galaxy as the 1 light of the galaxy cannot be outdone by shadows. The center of the galaxy is faster,
much faster in displacing light than it is with shadows being in displacement. So the day side of Earth will always face the
bright center of the galaxy wherever the planet is located in the 360 degrees vies of the 360 degrees of the inner galaxy
center. So the 360: 360 ratio= the 1:1 ratio.
Had you cast yourself out of the night ,into space and moved into the Earth's shadow you would be pulled into the galaxy
gravity center , not the other way round and so too does the light get pulled to the galaxy core as soon as it is reflected from
Earth. The observer moving in the shadow to find it's point where it would displace to, would only be moving outwards to the
space seen in the above image, and as such into empty space and space has no light where there is only shadow. So as you
observe the Sun getting smaller, the effect is to observe the galaxy center as being smaller, and this defines the fact that
the observer is still exposed to the light from the center of the galaxy, the light of the Sun and the light on the observers body.
So those are the 3 points of light as c1,c2,c3
and exist wherever there is space as the ratio of 1 related to the product of the
c1xc2xc3=
729 c
as the ratio of the 1:1
of the
c1 and c2
and the ratio 1:1
of the
c2 and c3.
This was known in every advanced civilization as the facts of the light being there first and that the shadows of the planets and
the light that causes them is related to the center.So there are 3 ratio's of the conservation of light as it belongs to the galaxy
center.
(1:1), (c1:c2) , (c2:c3)
Multiply the left and then the right
and you get the :
4c:36c
which is the multiple system 10 of the 360 degrees with the 40c
So the ratio expands as the light does so into:
40c:3600c
on the scale of the 12 billion light years of the universe, the ratio is
4 000 000 000 : 36 000 000 000
So it has width as the limit of the 12 billion is close to the volume of 3 of it's sides as 12 +12+12
on the super universe scale the definition of the 4 billion shorter side is equal to the 10 multiple.
of
40 000 000 000: 360 000 000 000
So it has
4+4+4+4+4+4+4+4+4+4 as the multiple of the 10 sides of it's measure beyond the present stage where the 12+12+12
may be localized before the great expansion.
as the universe ratio of light conservation that always faces the Sun or galaxy center as too does the Suns brightness face the galaxy brightness
as enveloped in universe pre history as the rotation around the Sun to the side that faces the galaxy center but also to rotate around the galaxy center
to find it facing other brighter galaxies.