image of: Christopher Columbus who
discovered the NEW LANDS of South
America ,date:3 augusti 1492.
The QUESTIONS and answers of archaeology do not always give the TRUE MEANING. So then, the science of ANTHROPOLOGY of languages and how they MIX
may be the closest we will get to the question of the MAYAN INCAN and AZTEC civilizations as 3 languages together, meaning a varied and rich language full of beautiful descriptive and beyond the moment into dreaming.
Are we living in a simulation? or perhaps in a language format, that has in it the MAYAN languages and that their interactive meaning in our own language of Europe = the universal language we only speak when in dreaming activity. It would be UNKNOWN to us.Because we sleep and most of us have no memory of their dreams or even the faintest about ,how to control them.
.
The Mayans did have a language of dreams, it was based on the night and the THREE CIVILIZATIONS of MAYA INCA and the AZTEC. So they must have had some inter related meanings of them and that they could be used to explore the unknown in dreaming (see Carlos Castaneda and the way NAGUAL'S as Sorcerers dream).
Here are some more glyphs and their European language MIX. There may be many such translations of the UNIVERSAL LANGUAGE of MAYA because of the facts that Many European languages also translate the UNIVERSAL MEANINGS between them.
You may also read each glyph and the translation languages as read in reverse.Basically any sense of meaning has some meaning,(see the anthropology of language source).
You may also read each glyph and the translation languages as read in reverse.Basically any sense of meaning has some meaning,(see the anthropology of language source).
from
Wikipedia
date 2018
October 15
The evolutionary emergence of language in the human species has been a subject of speculation for several centuries. The topic is difficult to study because of the lack of direct evidence. Consequently, scholars wishing to study the origins of language must draw inferences from other kinds of evidence such as the fossil record, archaeological evidence, contemporary language diversity, studies of language acquisition, and comparisons between human language and systems of communication existing among animals (particularly other primates). Many argue that the origins of language probably relate closely to the origins of modern human behavior, but there is little agreement about the implications and directionality of this connection.
This shortage of empirical evidence has led many scholars to regard the entire topic as unsuitable for serious study. In 1866, the Linguistic Society of Paris banned any existing or future debates on the subject, a prohibition which remained influential across much of the western world until late in the twentieth century.[1] Today, there are various hypotheses about how, why, when, and where language might have emerged.[2] Despite this, there is scarcely more agreement today than a hundred years ago, when Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection provoked a rash of armchair speculation on the topic.[3] Since the early 1990s, however, a number of linguists, archaeologists, psychologists, anthropologists, and others have attempted to address with new methods what some consider one of the hardest problems in science.[4]