The shared view of the universe.
Henryk Szubinski
Secrets of Einstein , Kennedy (Dere, philosophy) and Newton.
exposed.
Scifi science.
Imagine being on the Moon or even Kennedy the president that got us there. The images brought back from Apollo and even the flat screens of our TV's were only 2 dimensional flat surface images. So if you were to shift the pint of observation, the illusion is shattered. Imagine being there on the surface of the illusion, it looks like the people are in reference to the reality, but that is because they have agreed with the camera man to be in the image-illusion.
So too, much of the theory of the space time of Einstein was related to this illusion as though it could be in 2 places simultaneously. As in the camera position and in the astronaut position. Those who walked on the Moon are in the reality of seeing the moons surface close up. That could be the same as being in the image and standing on the illusion surface with the painting having no symmetry of depth as a true image. The interaction observes only lines that go here and there without building the image illusion. So too we of Earth who observe our planet from the surface ,rarely see the point of view from space where the "illusion" becomes real. I'm not saying that the Moon or the planets or the stars and galaxies are illusions. What I'm saying is that the space time has made it so that the Moon could displace into such an illusion of depth while you observe the horizon of the images being painted as the moon has to move around the Earth. So comparing the illusion with the Moon or any other body in space, at some point, anyone observing from the Moon would also get the special angle and the illusion appears true.
So the special effect of going to the Moon as seen from space , the extra angle of perception as the image fragments on the surface of the Moon and the whole is not visually identified as having special features of the "non symmetry" of the street art. So too when the astronauts returned back , the change in the angle of observation of them must have made some point of some special theory . The theory being that:
as one fragments from the 2D point of view on Earth , to above earth as the special angle of observing the illusion and then to do the same reference to approaching the Moon and then to leave it and to approach the Earth.
This would be like landing on one of the particles of color on the surface of the illusion to observe the "special observation position (where the illusion appears real) as observing the observer and then to paint an image of the Earth inside the image illusion so that it appears to be real from the position of the astronauts on the Moon and then to define the change of angle of the observer to see the illusion of the Earth's 2D surface.
The Moon and Earth and Sun are all real bodies in space, but the facts of human learning to recognize the way things appear from observations of it from Earth and as it was long ago, "not even from space".The illusion had to end ,or it was recreated as an illusion so that none would know about Kennedy.
Henryk Szubinski
Secrets of Einstein , Kennedy (Dere, philosophy) and Newton.
exposed.
Scifi science.
Imagine being on the Moon or even Kennedy the president that got us there. The images brought back from Apollo and even the flat screens of our TV's were only 2 dimensional flat surface images. So if you were to shift the pint of observation, the illusion is shattered. Imagine being there on the surface of the illusion, it looks like the people are in reference to the reality, but that is because they have agreed with the camera man to be in the image-illusion.
So too, much of the theory of the space time of Einstein was related to this illusion as though it could be in 2 places simultaneously. As in the camera position and in the astronaut position. Those who walked on the Moon are in the reality of seeing the moons surface close up. That could be the same as being in the image and standing on the illusion surface with the painting having no symmetry of depth as a true image. The interaction observes only lines that go here and there without building the image illusion. So too we of Earth who observe our planet from the surface ,rarely see the point of view from space where the "illusion" becomes real. I'm not saying that the Moon or the planets or the stars and galaxies are illusions. What I'm saying is that the space time has made it so that the Moon could displace into such an illusion of depth while you observe the horizon of the images being painted as the moon has to move around the Earth. So comparing the illusion with the Moon or any other body in space, at some point, anyone observing from the Moon would also get the special angle and the illusion appears true.
So the special effect of going to the Moon as seen from space , the extra angle of perception as the image fragments on the surface of the Moon and the whole is not visually identified as having special features of the "non symmetry" of the street art. So too when the astronauts returned back , the change in the angle of observation of them must have made some point of some special theory . The theory being that:
as one fragments from the 2D point of view on Earth , to above earth as the special angle of observing the illusion and then to do the same reference to approaching the Moon and then to leave it and to approach the Earth.
This would be like landing on one of the particles of color on the surface of the illusion to observe the "special observation position (where the illusion appears real) as observing the observer and then to paint an image of the Earth inside the image illusion so that it appears to be real from the position of the astronauts on the Moon and then to define the change of angle of the observer to see the illusion of the Earth's 2D surface.
The Moon and Earth and Sun are all real bodies in space, but the facts of human learning to recognize the way things appear from observations of it from Earth and as it was long ago, "not even from space".The illusion had to end ,or it was recreated as an illusion so that none would know about Kennedy.
So then, while the moon may move in it's spacial orbit in the background of the image, so too may the Sun and the stars and the galaxies. The question being, at what point does the interactions of the 4 main bodies in the universe start to relate to the image of the illusion as the surface of the painting as being real enough to define by measurements of space time and time dilation between them.
space time continuum as the layers of the effect of the flat surface of the street art "illusion" as being able to define the frontal observations position where the concave and convex go together from a special point of view of infinite layers of such flat space.So the result would be the eternal hardness of the total of every such surface.
If one assumes that the particles that make the image are parts of the whole as put together in a special way that only the artist may share with the observer. So the particles are related to the possibility of sharing one's vision. The shared observation is not excluded from the picture. Everything is shared.
If one assumes that the particles that make the image are parts of the whole as put together in a special way that only the artist may share with the observer. So the particles are related to the possibility of sharing one's vision. The shared observation is not excluded from the picture. Everything is shared.
To create holograms with the point of observation being in the center and around the observer in this point as able to turn to the left or right sides to observe more of the artistic illusions. The same may be then "in response to the collective" observations of one individuals inwards sight as the alternate, "outwards sight" of more than any number of shared observers seeing the same thing.
Possibly ,how teleportation would function.
Possibly ,how teleportation would function.
I made the scifi science theory and it goes like this.
the factor of any 2 images in flat space may be centered to define the point where they start to rotate as light in reference to the observers position being reduced into only one point of observation , while the extra dimension of knowing what one is observing while the observes focus is changed to an image that may be 50% real and 50 % illusion , so the theory defines the
ability to have peaceful alien contact with beings from other star systems as the image reality may have infinite points of reference simultaneously.
image credit
Daily express
alien contact Michio Kaku space science news latest aliens ufo
contact may be made soon says Michui Kaku
Actually it's an ongoing thing.Many have made contact with the CE-5 initiative with Dr Steven Greer showing how.
ability to have peaceful alien contact with beings from other star systems as the image reality may have infinite points of reference simultaneously.
image credit
Daily express
alien contact Michio Kaku space science news latest aliens ufo
contact may be made soon says Michui Kaku
Actually it's an ongoing thing.Many have made contact with the CE-5 initiative with Dr Steven Greer showing how.
It may be possible that Newton had some method to dork out the equations of the Differential and the Calculous,
by way of the simple approach, he could have then input any number into the system and get the relation values defined as the x dx or y dy or z dz
So what if this method was lost and we need to know how Newton got to his theory. Possibly , by finding it one finds a way to do the math's of functions that are more specific and more applied to how to define the groupings of sub sets and how they are equal in any number and this possibility would be greater than the 2 as the sigma and differential.
It may be possible that this approach to the calculous was hidden in the vatican or some unknown place where it was to be kept secret.
So it may be the background of the theory approach that is of the most basic thinking in relation to Newton and his classical works that
are long explanations of the possibilities of the 3 sets with a continuous carrier function that inter relates to themselves as with the input
of the missing "pre value" as the result or as the function used to get the answer.
by way of the simple approach, he could have then input any number into the system and get the relation values defined as the x dx or y dy or z dz
So what if this method was lost and we need to know how Newton got to his theory. Possibly , by finding it one finds a way to do the math's of functions that are more specific and more applied to how to define the groupings of sub sets and how they are equal in any number and this possibility would be greater than the 2 as the sigma and differential.
It may be possible that this approach to the calculous was hidden in the vatican or some unknown place where it was to be kept secret.
So it may be the background of the theory approach that is of the most basic thinking in relation to Newton and his classical works that
are long explanations of the possibilities of the 3 sets with a continuous carrier function that inter relates to themselves as with the input
of the missing "pre value" as the result or as the function used to get the answer.
The basic approach may have more possibilities than Newton was able to write down. In that case the special approach to his method could be the input of specifics for any theory to be made with any pre defined inputs and outputs. That is the magic of his work , in the conclusions he makes, but the method he used to arrive at this may be even more than magical.