Excursion to the arts of humanities.
by Henryk Szubinski.
seeing it from both sides.
This is the whole story as my mind may retell it from my memory being as
certain as i can be.
The facts of the school class visit to the supereme courts of Sydney Australia
had with it's beginings and sitting quetly as observers of the proceedings of
no certain case of law.
At some time between half way , i stood up and asked ,quite politely , without
any presumptions of the way that law is practiced, as to the possibility of having a
coffe break. This was quite in opposition to the opinions of the djudge, however he
did conceede to the possibility of such an event. When asked as to the reasons for it,
I answered that we need to have an "intermezzo" or point in time whereby we could
relax and then come back to the proceedings, having filled our stomachs with coffee or
as was later suggested, food at the canteena.
So as to this , point , the facts of the event ,suggested that everyone needs to take their
time seriously in regards to being "not so serious" as the proceedings could take many
hours and many were either exhausted or bored.
As it was then, my friend ,also stood up to the questions of "any more who feel this need."
So it was decided, that LAW also had FOOD, and that FOOD was also based on the need for
the energy that it gives to the consumer. However some point to the question, of , "should
those who are in defence or who are being JUDGED, also share in this BREAK of proceedings
and also gain their own measure of NUTRITION. As regards many of the CREATION myths,
eating and guilt are widely accepted as being the punishment of their inability to share.
So it may be that this PRIMAL need ,gives the PERSON BEING JUDGED some type of
advantage as to being able to defend himsef or herself or he /she, him/her with the
FREELY AVAILABLE energy , just as the JUDGE may do so. Arguments are that, the
memory may be altered by some influence of the medium of air or of words having magical
character and shows the prejudice of the dark ages and witch trials.
So in this way, I mean that the break also brings with it the relaxed atmosphere of the
way that law develops, being more humane in it's ways to have no greater presumption
as regards the outcome of the proceedings.
So in some way this new way of approaching law by way of the new approach whereby
there are no , primal thoughts concerning food and it's intonations of religion as the
foods of some type of deity that are PRE DETERMINED from the start and which give
UNFAVORABLE advantages to those who consume it in light of being AHEAD of the
OTHER in terms of ADVANTAGE of THOUGHT and it's energy ability.
So in this way I'm writing about the day that the fruit of knowledge no longer became
the way it has been. Rather I will show how the ,more courteous manner of behaviour in
COURT may be open and glad as to the need for shared respectives of the way people are
treated courteously and with respect and dignitiy of their emotional needs to be accepted.
And as such , the need for the judge and those who work in legal proceedings, to be
glad and happy with what they do. For had it been otherwise we would still be in the
dark ages or in times where our NEED FOR UNKNOWNS, would make us unaware of our
own constitution of standing and as such unable to share our feelings concerning issues we
have shared previously ,together.
So then, being open and glad, the atmosphere changes from the "UNKNOWN MYSTERY" or the
"IMPOSSIBLE KNOWLEDGE" into the shared positive attitude of our own convictions as not lacking
in bravery ,in the face of adversity.
While many suppose that FOOD is the GIFT from some higher deity, the facts of their opinion
as to how much of the BODY of evidence can be OPPOSED by the BODY of the PERSONS and their
own freedom from these limitations as the fact that, the Central Nervous System gains
favour by having time to take BREAKS in the proceedings of LAW.
So then, some who argue to the contrary ,that this activation of the CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
would be PRESUMED to be of such PRIMAL ENERGY EXPRESSIONS, that to turn it back on the
EFFECTED PERSON in defence of the case, would be denied the advantage of these ,very primal
emotions, and as such PRESUMPTIONS by way of such PREJUDICES of the way of their won person
INFLUENCING others to make it remain as such.
This cannot be, because it is not science of law,and the attitude of taking breaks in the court
hearings, is the way forwards , as regards the way they are met and the way they are held and kept as effective.
So I'm, in conclusion ,positive to the use of food or coffee breaks because they are in reference to our perception in the
position of the prefrontal cortex as the way we consume information together with our needs for the social interactions
of food.
In this way the resulting cognitive FOOD CONSUMPTION BY SOCIAL INTERACTION BECOMES the FREEDOM of it
because the BACKGROUND LAW is CENTRAL and USED IN LAW as UNIVERSAL. Meaning that there is no more
discrimination in SOCIAL TRENDS or GROUPS that use food for the OTHER REASONS.
So then, this new way of thinking about the humanities, results in the inescapable fact that it remains the CURRENT
TOPIC of
DISCUSSION in the meeting rooms where lawyers and Judges take their break for coffee and Lunch.They are actually
using benefits of the following from Wikipedia:
date 2018
May 18
:Colloquially, "perks" are those benefits of a more discretionary nature. Often, perks are given to employees who are doing notably well or have seniority. Common perks are take-home vehicles, hotel stays, free refreshments, leisure activities on work time (golf, etc.), stationery, allowances for lunch, and—when multiple choices exist—first choice of such things as job assignments and vacation scheduling. They may also be given first chance at job promotions when vacancies exist.
The following may be the commentary of my thoughts regarding the whole and as such made to appear in the background of the
atmosphere of the moment as i try to remember.
EXAMPLE OF THE PHILOSOPHY of LAW.
Arguments to the POSITIVE.
by Henryk Szubinski.
seeing it from both sides.
This is the whole story as my mind may retell it from my memory being as
certain as i can be.
The facts of the school class visit to the supereme courts of Sydney Australia
had with it's beginings and sitting quetly as observers of the proceedings of
no certain case of law.
At some time between half way , i stood up and asked ,quite politely , without
any presumptions of the way that law is practiced, as to the possibility of having a
coffe break. This was quite in opposition to the opinions of the djudge, however he
did conceede to the possibility of such an event. When asked as to the reasons for it,
I answered that we need to have an "intermezzo" or point in time whereby we could
relax and then come back to the proceedings, having filled our stomachs with coffee or
as was later suggested, food at the canteena.
So as to this , point , the facts of the event ,suggested that everyone needs to take their
time seriously in regards to being "not so serious" as the proceedings could take many
hours and many were either exhausted or bored.
As it was then, my friend ,also stood up to the questions of "any more who feel this need."
So it was decided, that LAW also had FOOD, and that FOOD was also based on the need for
the energy that it gives to the consumer. However some point to the question, of , "should
those who are in defence or who are being JUDGED, also share in this BREAK of proceedings
and also gain their own measure of NUTRITION. As regards many of the CREATION myths,
eating and guilt are widely accepted as being the punishment of their inability to share.
So it may be that this PRIMAL need ,gives the PERSON BEING JUDGED some type of
advantage as to being able to defend himsef or herself or he /she, him/her with the
FREELY AVAILABLE energy , just as the JUDGE may do so. Arguments are that, the
memory may be altered by some influence of the medium of air or of words having magical
character and shows the prejudice of the dark ages and witch trials.
So in this way, I mean that the break also brings with it the relaxed atmosphere of the
way that law develops, being more humane in it's ways to have no greater presumption
as regards the outcome of the proceedings.
So in some way this new way of approaching law by way of the new approach whereby
there are no , primal thoughts concerning food and it's intonations of religion as the
foods of some type of deity that are PRE DETERMINED from the start and which give
UNFAVORABLE advantages to those who consume it in light of being AHEAD of the
OTHER in terms of ADVANTAGE of THOUGHT and it's energy ability.
So in this way I'm writing about the day that the fruit of knowledge no longer became
the way it has been. Rather I will show how the ,more courteous manner of behaviour in
COURT may be open and glad as to the need for shared respectives of the way people are
treated courteously and with respect and dignitiy of their emotional needs to be accepted.
And as such , the need for the judge and those who work in legal proceedings, to be
glad and happy with what they do. For had it been otherwise we would still be in the
dark ages or in times where our NEED FOR UNKNOWNS, would make us unaware of our
own constitution of standing and as such unable to share our feelings concerning issues we
have shared previously ,together.
So then, being open and glad, the atmosphere changes from the "UNKNOWN MYSTERY" or the
"IMPOSSIBLE KNOWLEDGE" into the shared positive attitude of our own convictions as not lacking
in bravery ,in the face of adversity.
While many suppose that FOOD is the GIFT from some higher deity, the facts of their opinion
as to how much of the BODY of evidence can be OPPOSED by the BODY of the PERSONS and their
own freedom from these limitations as the fact that, the Central Nervous System gains
favour by having time to take BREAKS in the proceedings of LAW.
So then, some who argue to the contrary ,that this activation of the CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
would be PRESUMED to be of such PRIMAL ENERGY EXPRESSIONS, that to turn it back on the
EFFECTED PERSON in defence of the case, would be denied the advantage of these ,very primal
emotions, and as such PRESUMPTIONS by way of such PREJUDICES of the way of their won person
INFLUENCING others to make it remain as such.
This cannot be, because it is not science of law,and the attitude of taking breaks in the court
hearings, is the way forwards , as regards the way they are met and the way they are held and kept as effective.
So I'm, in conclusion ,positive to the use of food or coffee breaks because they are in reference to our perception in the
position of the prefrontal cortex as the way we consume information together with our needs for the social interactions
of food.
In this way the resulting cognitive FOOD CONSUMPTION BY SOCIAL INTERACTION BECOMES the FREEDOM of it
because the BACKGROUND LAW is CENTRAL and USED IN LAW as UNIVERSAL. Meaning that there is no more
discrimination in SOCIAL TRENDS or GROUPS that use food for the OTHER REASONS.
So then, this new way of thinking about the humanities, results in the inescapable fact that it remains the CURRENT
TOPIC of
DISCUSSION in the meeting rooms where lawyers and Judges take their break for coffee and Lunch.They are actually
using benefits of the following from Wikipedia:
date 2018
May 18
:Colloquially, "perks" are those benefits of a more discretionary nature. Often, perks are given to employees who are doing notably well or have seniority. Common perks are take-home vehicles, hotel stays, free refreshments, leisure activities on work time (golf, etc.), stationery, allowances for lunch, and—when multiple choices exist—first choice of such things as job assignments and vacation scheduling. They may also be given first chance at job promotions when vacancies exist.
The following may be the commentary of my thoughts regarding the whole and as such made to appear in the background of the
atmosphere of the moment as i try to remember.
EXAMPLE OF THE PHILOSOPHY of LAW.
Arguments to the POSITIVE.
Much of the philosophy of politics and the state of Europe during the Age of Enlightenment was written by King Leszczynski of Poland whose father was the SUN KING, Ludwig the 15 th.
Some of his works on the state and BENEFITS of human kind or humanities.
Or where one fact benefits another fact that is in usage and which would increase the total of the BENEFITS for everyone as law.
On the grounds of the use of the benefits of "taking breaks" in law proceedings, their usage may be "non limited" to only those who work in law ,but may extend to the larger populace and the way that law functions. So here the, the description of "benefits".
from; wikipedia
date 2018
May 18
Employee benefits and (especially in British English) benefits in kind (also called fringe benefits, perquisites, or perks) include various types of non-wage compensation provided to employees in addition to their normal wages or salaries.[1] In instances where an employee exchanges (cash) wages for some other form of benefit is generally referred to as a 'salary packaging' or 'salary exchange' arrangement. In most countries, most kinds of employee benefits are taxable to at least some degree. Examples of these benefits include: housing (employer-provided or employer-paid) furnished or not, with or without free utilities; group insurance (health, dental, life etc.); disability income protection; retirement benefits; daycare; tuition reimbursement; sick leave; vacation (paid and non-paid); social security; profit sharing; employer student loan contributions; conveyancing; domestic help (servants); and other specialized benefits.
The purpose of employee benefits is to increase the economic security of staff members, and in doing so, improve worker retention across the organization.[2]As such, it is one component of reward management.
Colloquially, "perks" are those benefits of a more discretionary nature. Often, perks are given to employees who are doing notably well or have seniority. Common perks are take-home vehicles, hotel stays, free refreshments, leisure activities on work time (golf, etc.), stationery, allowances for lunch, and—when multiple choices exist—first choice of such things as job assignments and vacation scheduling. They may also be given first chance at job promotions when vacancies exist.
Here then, the published work of King Leszczynski and the politics and law of BENEFITS (BIENFAISANT).
They should benefit the whole world ,if they are not,then no justice is served.
Some of his works on the state and BENEFITS of human kind or humanities.
Or where one fact benefits another fact that is in usage and which would increase the total of the BENEFITS for everyone as law.
On the grounds of the use of the benefits of "taking breaks" in law proceedings, their usage may be "non limited" to only those who work in law ,but may extend to the larger populace and the way that law functions. So here the, the description of "benefits".
from; wikipedia
date 2018
May 18
Employee benefits and (especially in British English) benefits in kind (also called fringe benefits, perquisites, or perks) include various types of non-wage compensation provided to employees in addition to their normal wages or salaries.[1] In instances where an employee exchanges (cash) wages for some other form of benefit is generally referred to as a 'salary packaging' or 'salary exchange' arrangement. In most countries, most kinds of employee benefits are taxable to at least some degree. Examples of these benefits include: housing (employer-provided or employer-paid) furnished or not, with or without free utilities; group insurance (health, dental, life etc.); disability income protection; retirement benefits; daycare; tuition reimbursement; sick leave; vacation (paid and non-paid); social security; profit sharing; employer student loan contributions; conveyancing; domestic help (servants); and other specialized benefits.
The purpose of employee benefits is to increase the economic security of staff members, and in doing so, improve worker retention across the organization.[2]As such, it is one component of reward management.
Colloquially, "perks" are those benefits of a more discretionary nature. Often, perks are given to employees who are doing notably well or have seniority. Common perks are take-home vehicles, hotel stays, free refreshments, leisure activities on work time (golf, etc.), stationery, allowances for lunch, and—when multiple choices exist—first choice of such things as job assignments and vacation scheduling. They may also be given first chance at job promotions when vacancies exist.
Here then, the published work of King Leszczynski and the politics and law of BENEFITS (BIENFAISANT).
They should benefit the whole world ,if they are not,then no justice is served.