NEW ORBITS and ECLIPSES
by Henryk Szubinski
Theory on resting mass of an object that has buoyancy and the new resting position that has change to state of rest. So that location of any object and ripples can be located.
1) So resting position change ----->2) state of rest.=
x (rest) position change<-----FORCE ------state of (x rest) =new position and previous position.
The change =the forces that change the ( position 1 into rest 2)
The theory is new but the observations are old.
Something i observed in Australia as a 16 teen year old, that I could not resign from describing after 30 years of it being in my memory. Because none reported it on the news i would have been the only one or among some few observers of this type of event .The basic existance of this event in time space has left me cluless for many years. I wondered about it. Knowing that by explaining it scientifically i would have it defined in physical terms to understand it better and to make the basic theory for others to read about.
This event occured shortly after I had taken pictures with my camera of the Halleys comet.
(the images of Halleys will be included here).
The basic upside down view will change the directions of the force doing the pull on the comet away and towards the force of the sun so that the upside down view is not the same in the previous right side up view. basically the change of observation will have changed force direction to and from into from to .So there is some basic focus on the direction and the Earths gravity field change as the views change by the cube g to the g to the 6 and the basic focus of the solar system as type 2 in relation to the g to 6 root in relation to the galaxy as the g to the 9. So that basically dividing the hemisphere of observation
as
g to 9 /2 = Force
where each exponential =g-1,g+2,g-3g+4,g-5,g+6,g-,7g+8,g-9
this =g to th 5 as change into vector North (or y) by multiples of g as g to 10 in relation to S vector (-y)
so that
g to 9/ y to 5 =F to the 10 -y
g to 4 /y=F to 10
as
g to 9 /2 = Force
where each exponential =g-1,g+2,g-3g+4,g-5,g+6,g-,7g+8,g-9
this =g to th 5 as change into vector North (or y) by multiples of g as g to 10 in relation to S vector (-y)
so that
g to 9/ y to 5 =F to the 10 -y
g to 4 /y=F to 10
Basically the observation change to Australia would have been the most important. To have been there in 1986 and taken pictures of the comet as 16 teen year old. I know that Hawking's would not turn down such chance , he would have wanted to be there as well to confirm his own theory of the universe. Basically when Hawking's was a teenager he would have had 20 or so years to get there. He was probably too busy with studies and then he contracts Lugarics disease.He would have tried to use the puncture through the Earth to the Australian side as the last ditch attempt at the prize when he realized that he couldn't get there.
The facts when im thinking back is that the comet would have altered the speed of rotation of the moon so that suddenly it accelerates out of view of the scopes and makes it's new ecliptic (when i observed it with the naked eye some days after the comet was heading out of the system, pulling the moon slightly out of its regular track and then appears again . It was a strange observation, It was almost as though the sky was on fire, the moon being closer than ever,i ran to get the camera to take new pictures and then everything returns to calm.
Here's the theory i made (dated 2015 Jan 21 )some 30 years later and shows change of the missing object being effected by some outside force that pulls it into new position. The basic object doing the warping is not shown, but the effects and how to locate the change in position are shown. Basically ,you could include the object influence in the z vector so that the change in gravity =g to the -6 Newtons which is a very small gravity change but big enough for the missing object to return to its rest state.
It's as simple as ripples in which the evidence of force (at the amplitude cause of the ripples)is visable in relation to how fat the objects travels before it returns to the flat space.
The facts when im thinking back is that the comet would have altered the speed of rotation of the moon so that suddenly it accelerates out of view of the scopes and makes it's new ecliptic (when i observed it with the naked eye some days after the comet was heading out of the system, pulling the moon slightly out of its regular track and then appears again . It was a strange observation, It was almost as though the sky was on fire, the moon being closer than ever,i ran to get the camera to take new pictures and then everything returns to calm.
Here's the theory i made (dated 2015 Jan 21 )some 30 years later and shows change of the missing object being effected by some outside force that pulls it into new position. The basic object doing the warping is not shown, but the effects and how to locate the change in position are shown. Basically ,you could include the object influence in the z vector so that the change in gravity =g to the -6 Newtons which is a very small gravity change but big enough for the missing object to return to its rest state.
It's as simple as ripples in which the evidence of force (at the amplitude cause of the ripples)is visable in relation to how fat the objects travels before it returns to the flat space.
Change:
Some theoretical thoughts,
The general theory uses the fact that water ripple circles will radiate outwards while the effect of the light will also send them back to the point where the amplitude started with some object falling into the water. So any ripple orbital outwards will = any ripple inwards ( basic running the film backwards and forwards will always return to the cause) by refraction this change is basic to define by the cause as seperated so that
wave out /wave in + F (ripple event ) =position of the object being moved or m
Because cameras have memory, so too does the water (when the observation is recorded and run in reverse )
The point here is to define something beyond this memory effect.
Basic theory defines the Solid matter bowl as an example of how the theory works. By rotating the bowl and while the ripple effect is in action, any object on the surface would basically get connected to the edge of the bowl by the object.When the bowl matter and the ripple are equal to the mass , when you drop both of them in gravity at some point or height (gravity )the water will splash outwards.,When you do the same thing in zero gravity, the water will either keep it's bowl position or it will tilt slightly ,releasing the water into the zero gravity environment.When there is an object in the water that is in zero gravity, the object will be glued to the inside of the water bubble but will continue to ripple the whole bubble while at the edge of it. So it is this position in the water morph in zero gravity and the ripples that define the origin of the bowl , because the object will be closest to it and the waves will displace from the object in zero gravity, towards the place where it returns to state of rest, basically when it is stable and appears to be a sphere of water with the object in it. When an astronaut observes the ripples on a blobb of water in zero gravity, he could move his body around in relation to the waves on the water spheres surface. Doing this it is possible that the water would direct the astronaut to the position when the water was released from the bowl. A type of causal cause of waves in space that will work on the whole spherical surface into spacial buoyancy of the sink effect =the basic position when the object was input into the bowl and water in zero gravity . As well as the 3rd factor of the bowl giving indications of where the object was input by motion of some force with the bubble of water in zero gravity towards it's main causality as though there was buoyancy of the object in reverse as the kinetic energy of the object when it displaced or had contact with the surface of the water in the bowl.
Some theoretical thoughts,
The general theory uses the fact that water ripple circles will radiate outwards while the effect of the light will also send them back to the point where the amplitude started with some object falling into the water. So any ripple orbital outwards will = any ripple inwards ( basic running the film backwards and forwards will always return to the cause) by refraction this change is basic to define by the cause as seperated so that
wave out /wave in + F (ripple event ) =position of the object being moved or m
Because cameras have memory, so too does the water (when the observation is recorded and run in reverse )
The point here is to define something beyond this memory effect.
Basic theory defines the Solid matter bowl as an example of how the theory works. By rotating the bowl and while the ripple effect is in action, any object on the surface would basically get connected to the edge of the bowl by the object.When the bowl matter and the ripple are equal to the mass , when you drop both of them in gravity at some point or height (gravity )the water will splash outwards.,When you do the same thing in zero gravity, the water will either keep it's bowl position or it will tilt slightly ,releasing the water into the zero gravity environment.When there is an object in the water that is in zero gravity, the object will be glued to the inside of the water bubble but will continue to ripple the whole bubble while at the edge of it. So it is this position in the water morph in zero gravity and the ripples that define the origin of the bowl , because the object will be closest to it and the waves will displace from the object in zero gravity, towards the place where it returns to state of rest, basically when it is stable and appears to be a sphere of water with the object in it. When an astronaut observes the ripples on a blobb of water in zero gravity, he could move his body around in relation to the waves on the water spheres surface. Doing this it is possible that the water would direct the astronaut to the position when the water was released from the bowl. A type of causal cause of waves in space that will work on the whole spherical surface into spacial buoyancy of the sink effect =the basic position when the object was input into the bowl and water in zero gravity . As well as the 3rd factor of the bowl giving indications of where the object was input by motion of some force with the bubble of water in zero gravity towards it's main causality as though there was buoyancy of the object in reverse as the kinetic energy of the object when it displaced or had contact with the surface of the water in the bowl.