image credit: Equilibriocosmico.blogspot.com
Mayan dream spell as the portal function of the time system in the Mayan calendar. but where would every Mayan be focusing their daily life ,continuously to one point in space?.
The theory needs some research first , on the "predicate" of existence and existence itself to find that the portal was the time before them as where they went when they were no more , and continued to live in the forwards projection of their time to know of those who went before them to live better lives.
Mayan dream spell as the portal function of the time system in the Mayan calendar. but where would every Mayan be focusing their daily life ,continuously to one point in space?.
The theory needs some research first , on the "predicate" of existence and existence itself to find that the portal was the time before them as where they went when they were no more , and continued to live in the forwards projection of their time to know of those who went before them to live better lives.
image of Mayan civilization credit: science alert.
Mayans and the Existence view.The 1 predicate:Anthropology : Carlos Castaneda On to the theory here, that the Mayans had some predicate on existence so first the "question of existence as predicate" and then some Wikipedia descriptives of their "existence" as the "predicate view". How do we even begin to understand the world of the Mayan with one word as any Mayan would naturally have his or her own name to identify them and to know this one must know the identity through the "predicate view". Could the Mayan identity exists as the predicate in the past or future and is the predicate still alive today in terms of the grammatical secret of the Mayans or their own predicate as existence in terms of something more as the 2012 calendar data. Much has been written by Carlos Castaneda in anthropology that states the existence of the "shared predicate views" of many sorcerers together that hold it has real shared value for each of the sorcerers but also for the whole group as the "reality of the predicate".This reality of the predicate may be trained and enhanced even when we are dreaming so as to teach us about real worlds out there accessible through our dreaming techniques. credit : Cambridge University Press. |
When we involve ourselves with the position of the predicate in the story of Carlos Castaneda and Don Juan we are not using special substances to have a better or more accurate ability to predict the newt thing that happens or is thought. Rather we are entering the realm of the "existence of the predicate as shared by two or more people" without it changing it's value but rather by "sense heightening" of it as a simple fact that becomes heightened in value to things and places, people and energies that we could not imagine were real.
|
credit:
scribd
scribd
credit:
De gryter.
De gryter.
The predicate of the personal "self view" as may relate to looking into a mirror or as the predicate of what one is doing in the descriptive when relating to the example of the Mayan civilization.
credit:
Academia.edu
credit:
Academia.edu
How do you have the "predicate view" of a civilization that like many others was based on the constructs of "creation and destruction" as the way to observe their own inner makings in terms of the predicate being within but ultimately causing more damage to the view of society in such a reference of being present there as a real observer from our own time , like a time traveler and also as the creative impulse of the Mayans to such a person and ultimately, also destruction.
the world view at the time of the Mayans would be the same world view of anyone living in our current situations of modern civilization.
from Wikipedia
A world view[1] or worldview is the fundamental cognitive orientation of an individual or society encompassing the whole of the individual's or society's knowledge and point of view. A world view can include natural philosophy; fundamental, existential, and normative postulates; or themes, values, emotions, and ethics.[2]
World view remains a confused and confusing concept in English, used very differently by linguists and sociologists. It is for this reason that James W. Underhill suggests five subcategories: world-perceiving, world-conceiving, cultural mindset, personal world, and perspective.[3][4][5]
World views are often taken to operate at a conscious level, directly accessible to articulation and discussion, as opposed to existing at a deeper, pre-conscious level, such as the idea of "ground" in Gestalt psychology and media analysis. However, core world view beliefs are often deeply rooted, and so are only rarely reflected on by individuals, and are brought to the surface only in moments of crises of faith.
first , "existence":
wikipedia:
Existence is the ability of an entity to interact with physical or mental reality.
In philosophy, it refers to the ontological property[1] of being.[2]
wikipedia:
Context in philosophy[edit]Materialism holds that the only things that exist are matter and energy, that all things are composed of material, that all actions require energy, and that all phenomena (including consciousness) are the result of the interaction of matter. Dialectical materialism does not make a distinction between being and existence, and defines it as the objective reality of various forms of matter.[2]
Idealism holds that the only things that exist are thoughts and ideas, while the material world is secondary.[4][5] In idealism, existence is sometimes contrasted with transcendence, the ability to go beyond the limits of existence.[2] As a form of epistemological idealism, rationalism interprets existence as cognizable and rational, that all things are composed of strings of reasoning, requiring an associated idea of the thing, and all phenomena (including consciousness) are the result of an understanding of the imprint from the noumenal world in which lies beyond the thing-in-itself.
In scholasticism, existence of a thing is not derived from its essence but is determined by the creative volition of God, the dichotomy of existence and essence demonstrates that the dualism of the created universe is only resolvable through God.[2] Empiricism recognizes existence of singular facts, which are not derivable and which are observable through empirical experience.
The exact definition of existence is one of the most important and fundamental topics of ontology, the philosophical study of the nature of being, existence, or reality in general, as well as of the basic categories of being and their relations. Traditionally listed as a part of the major branch of philosophy known as metaphysics, ontology deals with questions concerning what things or entities exist or can be said to exist, and how such things or entities can be grouped, related within a hierarchy, and subdivided according to similarities and differences.
wikipedia:
Predicative nature[edit]John Stuart Mill (and also Kant's pupil Herbart) argued that the predicative nature of existence was proved by sentences like "A centaur is a poetic fiction"[10] or "A greatest number is impossible" (Herbart).[11] Franz Brentano challenged this; so also (as is better known) did Frege. Brentano argued that we can join the concept represented by a noun phrase "an A" to the concept represented by an adjective "B" to give the concept represented by the noun phrase "a B-A". For example, we can join "a man" to "wise" to give "a wise man". But the noun phrase "a wise man" is not a sentence, whereas "some man is wise" is a sentence. Hence the copula must do more than merely join or separate concepts. Furthermore, adding "exists" to "a wise man", to give the complete sentence "a wise man exists" has the same effect as joining "some man" to "wise" using the copula. So the copula has the same effect as "exists". Brentano argued that every categorical proposition can be translated into an existential one without change in meaning and that the "exists" and "does not exist" of the existential proposition take the place of the copula. He showed this by the following examples:
The categorical proposition "Some man is sick" has the same meaning as the existential proposition "A sick man exists" or "There is a sick man."
The categorical proposition "No stone is living" has the same meaning as the existential proposition "A living stone does not exist" or "there is no living stone".
The categorical proposition "All men are mortal" has the same meaning as the existential proposition "An immortal man does not exist" or "there is no immortal man".
The categorical proposition "Some man is not learned" has the same meaning as the existential proposition "A non-learned man exists" or "there is a non-learned man".Frege developed a similar view (though later) in his great work The Foundations of Arithmetic, as did Charles Sanders Peirce (but Peirce held that the possible and the real are not limited to the actual, individually existent). The Frege-Brentano view is the basis of the dominant position in modern Anglo-American philosophy: that existence is asserted by the existential quantifier (as expressed by Quine's slogan "To be is to be the value of a variable." — On What There Is, 1948).[12]
Example of reality portals that function like a time portal or a dimensional gate to the Mayan world from this one.
This could be the basic ,"view of existence " of the whole meaning of the Mayan code as it was then something
similar to the use of images of nature, their calendar, the special "real like" colors and the inclusion of the panther
as well as some glyphs. as is the tradition with mayan sorcery to speculate about the possibilities of life after this
world and to crate groups of shamans to explore these possibilities by using such "reality tunnels"much of the art
of Carlos Castaneda and the ways of the "Sonora desert dwellers in Mexico " such as Don Juan and his story of
the reality tunnel between him and his apprentice, Carlos Castaneda , the grandfather of the hippy age.
So then, the Mayan " predicate" does exist.
image credit: facebook.com
wikipedia
Reality tunnels[edit]Main article: Reality tunnelA reality tunnel is a theoretical subconscious set of mental filters formed from beliefs and experiences, every individual interprets the same world differently, hence "Truth is in the eye of the beholder". The idea being that an individual's perceptions are influenced or determined by their world view. The idea does not necessarily imply that there is no objective truth; rather that our access to it is mediated through our senses, experience, conditioning, prior beliefs, and other non-objective factors. The term can also apply to groups of people united by beliefs: we can speak of the fundamentalist Christian reality tunnel or the ontological naturalist reality tunnel. A parallel can be seen in the psychological concept of confirmation bias—the human tendency to notice and assign significance to observations that confirm existing beliefs, while filtering out or rationalizing away observations that do not fit with prior beliefs and expectations.[46]
Reality tunnels[edit]Main article: Reality tunnelA reality tunnel is a theoretical subconscious set of mental filters formed from beliefs and experiences, every individual interprets the same world differently, hence "Truth is in the eye of the beholder". The idea being that an individual's perceptions are influenced or determined by their world view. The idea does not necessarily imply that there is no objective truth; rather that our access to it is mediated through our senses, experience, conditioning, prior beliefs, and other non-objective factors. The term can also apply to groups of people united by beliefs: we can speak of the fundamentalist Christian reality tunnel or the ontological naturalist reality tunnel. A parallel can be seen in the psychological concept of confirmation bias—the human tendency to notice and assign significance to observations that confirm existing beliefs, while filtering out or rationalizing away observations that do not fit with prior beliefs and expectations.[46]
image of Poseidon and his trident, credit; commons .wikimedia.org
Predicates as the object in a sentence could be the origin of ancient "object value" assigned to specific objects and related to "persons who held these "predicate" objects as objects of power.
Much of Mayan genealogy of the gods, So then each god held something, an object that was the point in their sentence or meaning as the predicate in their sentence to describe everything we know.
The Mayan gods usually held more common objects such as the symbols of the Mayan count , the numerical system as real objects that fit into place like the puzzle of their meaning. Some also hold their objects of nature such as a plant symbolizing the fact that it does not move unless given water and light so that in this way it describes it's own predicate of expression as either being valued as part of someones ownership or as part of nature, such as the forest.
image of the goddess, lyxchel with the representation of the flower taken from the jungle story as an excerpt of the story of their nature as the jungle speaks of the predicate change from the object to the word as from the strangled serpent ( showing that the story of it has been cut short) and that the flower will persevere when planted in the pot and given water and light from the sun god.
image pinterest
Predicates as the object in a sentence could be the origin of ancient "object value" assigned to specific objects and related to "persons who held these "predicate" objects as objects of power.
Much of Mayan genealogy of the gods, So then each god held something, an object that was the point in their sentence or meaning as the predicate in their sentence to describe everything we know.
The Mayan gods usually held more common objects such as the symbols of the Mayan count , the numerical system as real objects that fit into place like the puzzle of their meaning. Some also hold their objects of nature such as a plant symbolizing the fact that it does not move unless given water and light so that in this way it describes it's own predicate of expression as either being valued as part of someones ownership or as part of nature, such as the forest.
image of the goddess, lyxchel with the representation of the flower taken from the jungle story as an excerpt of the story of their nature as the jungle speaks of the predicate change from the object to the word as from the strangled serpent ( showing that the story of it has been cut short) and that the flower will persevere when planted in the pot and given water and light from the sun god.
image pinterest
Mayan god, Kinich Ahau of the sun.Basically shows the minimal requirements to get any conversation going by way of his Kin count which he stretches his hand to measure the predicate of himself in the story of the Sun as an object but also of the predicate of something more to which the r´predicate will cycle from one value to another and then a new cycle that displaces beyond the first predicate.This shows the importance of rank and relation of rank in social levels that make possible the "predicate"to become part of the discussions about the Sun as part of the location of it in sentences of high thought in Mayan age of antiquity.
wikipedia
wikipedia