current technology makes it difficult to displace solids into space because of the fluidity needed. But is there another way, a way ,"hinted at" by Kennedy?.
from forbes:
space shuttle launch path.
space shuttle launch path.
Is there any difference between the cubic measures of a cube that weights 1000 kilograms and that of a cube that weights 1000 liters.
To get water into space seems to require more effort than the standard measure of the same volume but with solid weight of the metal
of a satellite or the space ship itself.
We are always using the fluidity of fuel to displace solid spaceships , not the the other way around.But then again, the fluidity of spaceships
could be some solid method of motion.
In many scifi science concepts is the type of fuel that is a stable cubic solid that has some special ,"levitation" ability or function that makes it
move freely in any direction at any speed and anywhere in the universe.
Perhaps this could be the type that Kennedy defined as the, "super large spaceships" and that when you get to some special size of the
space ship ,the solid interchanges to the fluid and the fluid changes to the solid as depending on the total weight of the cubic of water
compared to the cubic of some solid as the
Kilogram ratio to liters and then the ratio response of the liter ratio to the solid.
In any case the division of the fluid as it expands, and becomes difficult to move ,the reference to solids is that they compress.
So then the exp =1 and the comp =2
So on either side of the change of fluid to solid and solid to fluid the 1/2 = 0.5 but the 2/1 = 2
meaning that the ratio that compares them is equal to the fluidity and solidity as
0.5 solid = 2 fluid
0.5 delta= 2 gamma
as the delta = solidity in change and the gamma is the flow or motion of the water as it moves.
2/0.5=delta / gamma
4= delta / gamma.
The 4 as the Resistance of any motion to displace from fluidity equates to the ,"change of the thickness of any fluid " as limited to the
R as on some weight function where the fluid changes to solid ,meaning that this value must be some x value as , R/x+1
where the 1 = expansion.
So ,why lift fuel when you're using fuel to lift.
the expansion of the gamma as the gamma used to lift on higher alpha exponentials needed to go over the limit of the 2 equations.
as alpha gamma / gamma x 1000000 alpha.
the change is in the decimal of the expansion as 0.0000000alpha
Could there be another way to lift than the ,"glue that sticks to the Earth's gravity", when speaking in terms of water and the paradox
of the water always creating curvature as it moves over the Earth's water ,that seems to have no gravity between them as the
equalization of the lift needed for water to lift water= sum = 2 water
as compression or gravity.
and the water lifted to zero gravity= 1 water as expansion or anti gravity.
as 2/ H2O / 1 H2O
this still equates to 2 H2O even though there are 3 H2O as the sum.
.
here are some of the largest space ships in scifi.
To get water into space seems to require more effort than the standard measure of the same volume but with solid weight of the metal
of a satellite or the space ship itself.
We are always using the fluidity of fuel to displace solid spaceships , not the the other way around.But then again, the fluidity of spaceships
could be some solid method of motion.
In many scifi science concepts is the type of fuel that is a stable cubic solid that has some special ,"levitation" ability or function that makes it
move freely in any direction at any speed and anywhere in the universe.
Perhaps this could be the type that Kennedy defined as the, "super large spaceships" and that when you get to some special size of the
space ship ,the solid interchanges to the fluid and the fluid changes to the solid as depending on the total weight of the cubic of water
compared to the cubic of some solid as the
Kilogram ratio to liters and then the ratio response of the liter ratio to the solid.
In any case the division of the fluid as it expands, and becomes difficult to move ,the reference to solids is that they compress.
So then the exp =1 and the comp =2
So on either side of the change of fluid to solid and solid to fluid the 1/2 = 0.5 but the 2/1 = 2
meaning that the ratio that compares them is equal to the fluidity and solidity as
0.5 solid = 2 fluid
0.5 delta= 2 gamma
as the delta = solidity in change and the gamma is the flow or motion of the water as it moves.
2/0.5=delta / gamma
4= delta / gamma.
The 4 as the Resistance of any motion to displace from fluidity equates to the ,"change of the thickness of any fluid " as limited to the
R as on some weight function where the fluid changes to solid ,meaning that this value must be some x value as , R/x+1
where the 1 = expansion.
So ,why lift fuel when you're using fuel to lift.
the expansion of the gamma as the gamma used to lift on higher alpha exponentials needed to go over the limit of the 2 equations.
as alpha gamma / gamma x 1000000 alpha.
the change is in the decimal of the expansion as 0.0000000alpha
Could there be another way to lift than the ,"glue that sticks to the Earth's gravity", when speaking in terms of water and the paradox
of the water always creating curvature as it moves over the Earth's water ,that seems to have no gravity between them as the
equalization of the lift needed for water to lift water= sum = 2 water
as compression or gravity.
and the water lifted to zero gravity= 1 water as expansion or anti gravity.
as 2/ H2O / 1 H2O
this still equates to 2 H2O even though there are 3 H2O as the sum.
.
here are some of the largest space ships in scifi.