the INTER INVOLVEMENT of the universe
by Henryk Szubinski
This theory is made with approximations of the distance in light years.
The theory is that the continuum of the multiple 3x of any light years displacement
has the gradual increase of size from the newly discovered EXO PLANET at 300 light years
that defines the probability of life like our own planet.
The next GRADATION defines the 300 000 light years away distance to the star clusters in the milky
way galaxy that are being used to define "DARK MATTER".
And then we have the 300 000 000 as the distance to the HUBBLE DEEP FIELD that defines the
WARPING of SPACE at the edge of the universe.
So then, these distances must define the way that the visual imagery of the exo planet and the
dark matter are the way in which space may displace strong enough telescopes to make images of them
just as we have images of the DEEP FIELD.
So then, these distances are RELATIVE to each other. Meaning that, as one depends on the second and this
depends on the 3 rd.
So then, dark matter will be found as the SPACE that we observe around any planet any distance away and this
edge and background are as real as the space we see the stars in. So the planet is in the space, or the planet has
space to exist , or even, that the space and edge are different depending on the possibility of life on it.
The reality of images with space are that they have some resolution. When you're making images of far away planets, the edge of them
will also be space but on the higher resolution of the space, there.
So the resolution of space where there are star clusters will focus, either on the exact resolution of each star or the whole group
of stars.
The theird value of the resolution of space in the deep field would have to be so great that you could observe a planet of star in it
from Earth and see enough details of the space around them to know that the planet or star is at some RESOLUTION x value
of the magnification of the space there. So which resolution came first?.
Could it be that SPACE = resolution scale that moves faster than visual focus to define the clear edges of planets and stars and
galaxies far away.
In this context the human ability to use visual observation in the past may be showing up as VISUAL PROBLEMS of the past thousand years of
astronomy as human vision has evolved to be able to see things closer up with the current technology everyone uses.
By comparing the 3 values by some type of RESOLUTION SCALE TRIANGULATION by LENSES that are digital ,there is the possibility of having images that are as real as you and me from any distance while having no TIME DILATION problems.
Direct image of the EXO PLANET
from : Forbes.
This image from ESO's Very Large Telescope (VLT) shows the newly discovered planet HD95086 b, next to its parent star. Image released June 3, 2013.
Credit: ESO/J. Rameau
from : Forbes.
This image from ESO's Very Large Telescope (VLT) shows the newly discovered planet HD95086 b, next to its parent star. Image released June 3, 2013.
Credit: ESO/J. Rameau
Star clusters and dark matter.
At the distance to the DEEP FIELD we are unsure if the image shows the past or the NOW.
from Wikipedia
date 2018
July 06
time, 14:36
Image resolution is the detail an image holds. The term applies to raster digital images, film images, and other types of images. Higher resolution means more image detail.
Image resolution can be measured in various ways. Resolution quantifies how close lines can be to each other and still be visibly resolved. Resolution units can be tied to physical sizes (e.g. lines per mm, lines per inch), to the overall size of a picture (lines per picture height, also known simply as lines, TV lines, or TVL), or to angular subtense. Line pairs are often used instead of lines; a line pair comprises a dark line and an adjacent light line. A line is either a dark line or a light line. A resolution of 10 lines per millimeter means 5 dark lines alternating with 5 light lines, or 5 line pairs per millimeter (5 LP/mm). Photographic lens and film resolution are most often quoted in line pairs per millimeter.
Here are my notes:
The measurements may be in meters as the same image resolution as images of planets in light years.
The measure defines the REALITY of the possible triangulations as related to IMAGE FLUIDITY similar
to how images are made in water.
As the though experiment:
Imagine there are thousands of divers in one great ocean and they each have telescopes with them.
As you observe the ocean from above, some divers return to the surface, while others dive deeper
and the time increases.The time is random.
Now then, there exists some STREAM of the motion of each of the divers that dive deeper and deeper.
Connecting to this stream will define the fluidity of the medium of water but it may also define the medium
of SPACE.
date 2018
July 06
time, 14:36
Image resolution is the detail an image holds. The term applies to raster digital images, film images, and other types of images. Higher resolution means more image detail.
Image resolution can be measured in various ways. Resolution quantifies how close lines can be to each other and still be visibly resolved. Resolution units can be tied to physical sizes (e.g. lines per mm, lines per inch), to the overall size of a picture (lines per picture height, also known simply as lines, TV lines, or TVL), or to angular subtense. Line pairs are often used instead of lines; a line pair comprises a dark line and an adjacent light line. A line is either a dark line or a light line. A resolution of 10 lines per millimeter means 5 dark lines alternating with 5 light lines, or 5 line pairs per millimeter (5 LP/mm). Photographic lens and film resolution are most often quoted in line pairs per millimeter.
Here are my notes:
The measurements may be in meters as the same image resolution as images of planets in light years.
The measure defines the REALITY of the possible triangulations as related to IMAGE FLUIDITY similar
to how images are made in water.
As the though experiment:
Imagine there are thousands of divers in one great ocean and they each have telescopes with them.
As you observe the ocean from above, some divers return to the surface, while others dive deeper
and the time increases.The time is random.
Now then, there exists some STREAM of the motion of each of the divers that dive deeper and deeper.
Connecting to this stream will define the fluidity of the medium of water but it may also define the medium
of SPACE.
How perception functions.
The PONZO ILLUSION.
from
Wikipedia
date 2018
June 06
time, 15:05
An example of the Ponzo illusion. Both of the horizontal yellow lines are the same length.The Ponzo illusion is a geometrical-optical illusion that was first demonstrated by the Italian psychologist Mario Ponzo (1882–1960) in 1911.[1] He suggested that the human mind judges an object's size based on its background. He showed this by drawing two identical lines across a pair of converging lines, similar to railway tracks. The upper line looks longer because we interpret the converging sides according to linear perspective as parallel lines receding into the distance. In this context, we interpret the upper line as though it were farther away, so we see it as longer – a farther object would have to be longer than a nearer one for both to produce retinal images of the same size.
One of the explanations for the Ponzo illusion is the "perspective hypothesis", which states that the perspective feature in the figure is obviously produced by the converging lines ordinarily associated with distance, that is, the two oblique lines appear to converge toward the horizon or a vanishing point. Another is the "framing-effects hypothesis", which says that the difference in the separation or gap of the horizontal lines from the framing converging lines may determine, or at least contribute to the magnitude of the distortion.
The Ponzo illusion is one possible explanation of the Moon illusion, with objects appearing "far away" (because they are "on" the horizon) appearing bigger than objects "overhead".[2]
This typical visual illusion also occurs in touch and with an auditory-to-visual sensory-substitution device. However, prior visual experience seems mandatory to perceive it as demonstrated by the fact that congenitally blind subjects are not sensitive to it.
The Ponzo illusion has also been used to demonstrate a dissociation between vision-for-perception and vision-for-action (see Two-streams hypothesis). Thus, the scaling of grasping movements directed towards objects embedded within a Ponzo illusion is not subject to the size illusion.[3] In other words, the opening between the index finger and thumb is scaled to the real not the apparent size of the target object as the grasping hand approaches the object.
Cross-cultural differences in susceptibility to the Ponzo illusion have been noted, with non-Western and rural people showing less susceptibility.[4] Other recent research suggests that an individual's receptivity to this illusion, as well as the Ebbinghaus illusion, may be inversely correlated with the size of that individual's primary visual cortex.[5]
The PONZO ILLUSION.
from
Wikipedia
date 2018
June 06
time, 15:05
An example of the Ponzo illusion. Both of the horizontal yellow lines are the same length.The Ponzo illusion is a geometrical-optical illusion that was first demonstrated by the Italian psychologist Mario Ponzo (1882–1960) in 1911.[1] He suggested that the human mind judges an object's size based on its background. He showed this by drawing two identical lines across a pair of converging lines, similar to railway tracks. The upper line looks longer because we interpret the converging sides according to linear perspective as parallel lines receding into the distance. In this context, we interpret the upper line as though it were farther away, so we see it as longer – a farther object would have to be longer than a nearer one for both to produce retinal images of the same size.
One of the explanations for the Ponzo illusion is the "perspective hypothesis", which states that the perspective feature in the figure is obviously produced by the converging lines ordinarily associated with distance, that is, the two oblique lines appear to converge toward the horizon or a vanishing point. Another is the "framing-effects hypothesis", which says that the difference in the separation or gap of the horizontal lines from the framing converging lines may determine, or at least contribute to the magnitude of the distortion.
The Ponzo illusion is one possible explanation of the Moon illusion, with objects appearing "far away" (because they are "on" the horizon) appearing bigger than objects "overhead".[2]
This typical visual illusion also occurs in touch and with an auditory-to-visual sensory-substitution device. However, prior visual experience seems mandatory to perceive it as demonstrated by the fact that congenitally blind subjects are not sensitive to it.
The Ponzo illusion has also been used to demonstrate a dissociation between vision-for-perception and vision-for-action (see Two-streams hypothesis). Thus, the scaling of grasping movements directed towards objects embedded within a Ponzo illusion is not subject to the size illusion.[3] In other words, the opening between the index finger and thumb is scaled to the real not the apparent size of the target object as the grasping hand approaches the object.
Cross-cultural differences in susceptibility to the Ponzo illusion have been noted, with non-Western and rural people showing less susceptibility.[4] Other recent research suggests that an individual's receptivity to this illusion, as well as the Ebbinghaus illusion, may be inversely correlated with the size of that individual's primary visual cortex.[5]