Archaeology
Lund University Sweden 2012-2013
Henryk Szubinski
The illusion of the rotational time and the time of various positions where archaeological evidence has been found that would connect the dots of rotational time has some flaw in it, together with the other problem of the tilt of the Earth as it changes throughout the thousands and hundred of thousands of years and even million of years as the polar tilt and it's time change that defines true time as the +- of the reality of polar approach back to it's original position as the vertical reference of the Earth's curvature.
Some may speculate that this was calculated in the MAYAN calendar of the date 2012 when everything would return to the position of the solar clock or the galactic time when everything becomes curvature related to the polar proximity of the rotation of the poles as the position that interacts with the stars polar rotation and the galactic pole without any illusions of the polar being closer than any other polar position.
Lund University Sweden 2012-2013
Henryk Szubinski
The illusion of the rotational time and the time of various positions where archaeological evidence has been found that would connect the dots of rotational time has some flaw in it, together with the other problem of the tilt of the Earth as it changes throughout the thousands and hundred of thousands of years and even million of years as the polar tilt and it's time change that defines true time as the +- of the reality of polar approach back to it's original position as the vertical reference of the Earth's curvature.
Some may speculate that this was calculated in the MAYAN calendar of the date 2012 when everything would return to the position of the solar clock or the galactic time when everything becomes curvature related to the polar proximity of the rotation of the poles as the position that interacts with the stars polar rotation and the galactic pole without any illusions of the polar being closer than any other polar position.
The whole pole of Europe as displaced to the edge.
To get the theory of early man from Africa ,then the use of the pole of the Earth in the southern position and the falsity of the time zones being equal to the difference and change of positions from Africa to Europe.
When the horizon of Africa = the edge of the Earth, then the distance is shorter even though it is longer by curvature . The curvature then is true as around the north pole but not as seen from the radius that indicates the ways in and out of migrations.
To get the theory of early man from Africa ,then the use of the pole of the Earth in the southern position and the falsity of the time zones being equal to the difference and change of positions from Africa to Europe.
When the horizon of Africa = the edge of the Earth, then the distance is shorter even though it is longer by curvature . The curvature then is true as around the north pole but not as seen from the radius that indicates the ways in and out of migrations.
As relates to the curvature of the CHINA, INDIA, AUSTRALIA as being longer in length to the north pole, because if the south pole = the origin from Africa, then the origin from the North pole must also be true. But that is not the case.To define the point of observation where the 3 vectors 1,2,3 are totally straight would from China, India and Australia would not include Europe and the false Southern pole would easily be not included from the curvature problem of real time measurements. The direct vectors as 1,2,3 as straight would cheat the time measure and would be shorter so that the early origin would be untrue. The North pole indicates that EUROPE is closer to the North pole and must be the first true radius displacement as the ancient European time that was represented by stonehenge.
So that the probability that the STONEHENGE as the TRUE POLE would be closer to the EUROPEAN NORTH POLE than it is in relation to the SOUTH POLE and AFRICA. Because the North pole is closer to the Northern regions would imply that it has closer distance , as such the true north and the true European origins are related to EUROPE as having it's AREA as true to the North pole. So that, the African pole being closer to Africa would be true, only if the shift of regions are = to the shift of displacement to any region outside it in relation tot he North pole. But this delta value of SHIFTS would prove that AFRICA has been an archaeolgically TIME FAULT that pushes AFRICA in a space and time without proof of the migrations of people in this GAP. This cannot be true in relations of the SHIT being = proof of the South pole and the proof of the SHIFT and the Proof of the closer regions of their own pole. But this pole does not exist in true measures from space. Africa comes short of the fact and ends as the edge of the horizon that does not displace the GAP into Europe.
So that the probability that the STONEHENGE as the TRUE POLE would be closer to the EUROPEAN NORTH POLE than it is in relation to the SOUTH POLE and AFRICA. Because the North pole is closer to the Northern regions would imply that it has closer distance , as such the true north and the true European origins are related to EUROPE as having it's AREA as true to the North pole. So that, the African pole being closer to Africa would be true, only if the shift of regions are = to the shift of displacement to any region outside it in relation tot he North pole. But this delta value of SHIFTS would prove that AFRICA has been an archaeolgically TIME FAULT that pushes AFRICA in a space and time without proof of the migrations of people in this GAP. This cannot be true in relations of the SHIT being = proof of the South pole and the proof of the SHIFT and the Proof of the closer regions of their own pole. But this pole does not exist in true measures from space. Africa comes short of the fact and ends as the edge of the horizon that does not displace the GAP into Europe.
More data:
The Earth's tilt then, defines the thousands of years of one angle of inclination so that the Earth is rotating by way of the direct vectors of the surface as it tightens and then it loosens again into the curvature ,seen from another angle , after another cycle so that the tensile and the loose strings are continuously resulting in the true time and curvature of the Earth. This happens by the Earth's tilt either in the tensile or the loosened functions of Earth's rotation time.
Here's some background data on the Earth's inclination as AXIAL TILT
and MAYAN civilization as the AXIAL PROCESSION
date, 12,06,2017
In astronomy, axial tilt, also known as obliquity, is the angle between an object's rotational axis and its orbital axis, or, equivalently, the angle between its equatorial plane and orbital plane.[1] It differs from orbital inclination.
At an obliquity of zero, the two axes point in the same direction; i.e., the rotational axis is perpendicular to the orbital plane. Over the course of an orbit, the obliquity usually does not change considerably, and the orientation of the axis remains the same relative to the background stars. This causes one pole to be directed more toward the Sun on one side of the orbit, and the other pole on the other side — the cause of the seasons on the Earth. Earth's obliquity oscillates between 22.1 and 24.5 degrees on a 41,000-year cycle; the earth's mean obliquity is currently 23°26′13.3″ (or 23.43703°) and decreasing.
In astronomy, axial precession is a gravity-induced, slow, and continuous change in the orientation of an astronomical body's rotational axis. In particular, it can refer to the gradual shift in the orientation of Earth's axis of rotation, which, similar to a wobbling top, traces out a pair of cones joined at their apices in a cycle of approximately 26,000 years.[1] The term "precession" typically refers only to this largest part of the motion; other changes in the alignment of Earth's axis--nutation and polar motion—are much smaller in magnitude.
Earth's precession was historically called the precession of the equinoxes, because the equinoxes moved westward along the ecliptic relative to the fixed stars, opposite to the yearly motion of the Sun along the ecliptic. This term is still used in non-technical discussions, that is, when detailed mathematics are absent. Historically,[2] the discovery of the precession of the equinoxes is usually attributed in the west to the Hellenistic-era (2nd century BC) astronomer, Hipparchus, although there are claims of its earlier discovery, such as in the Indian text, Vedanga Jyotisha, dating from 700 BC.[citation needed] With improvements in the ability to calculate the gravitational force between and among planets during the first half of the nineteenth century, it was recognized that the ecliptic itself moved slightly, which was named planetary precession, as early as 1863, while the dominant component was named lunisolar precession.[3] Their combination was named general precession, instead of precession of the equinoxes.
Here's some background data on the Earth's inclination as AXIAL TILT
and MAYAN civilization as the AXIAL PROCESSION
date, 12,06,2017
In astronomy, axial tilt, also known as obliquity, is the angle between an object's rotational axis and its orbital axis, or, equivalently, the angle between its equatorial plane and orbital plane.[1] It differs from orbital inclination.
At an obliquity of zero, the two axes point in the same direction; i.e., the rotational axis is perpendicular to the orbital plane. Over the course of an orbit, the obliquity usually does not change considerably, and the orientation of the axis remains the same relative to the background stars. This causes one pole to be directed more toward the Sun on one side of the orbit, and the other pole on the other side — the cause of the seasons on the Earth. Earth's obliquity oscillates between 22.1 and 24.5 degrees on a 41,000-year cycle; the earth's mean obliquity is currently 23°26′13.3″ (or 23.43703°) and decreasing.
In astronomy, axial precession is a gravity-induced, slow, and continuous change in the orientation of an astronomical body's rotational axis. In particular, it can refer to the gradual shift in the orientation of Earth's axis of rotation, which, similar to a wobbling top, traces out a pair of cones joined at their apices in a cycle of approximately 26,000 years.[1] The term "precession" typically refers only to this largest part of the motion; other changes in the alignment of Earth's axis--nutation and polar motion—are much smaller in magnitude.
Earth's precession was historically called the precession of the equinoxes, because the equinoxes moved westward along the ecliptic relative to the fixed stars, opposite to the yearly motion of the Sun along the ecliptic. This term is still used in non-technical discussions, that is, when detailed mathematics are absent. Historically,[2] the discovery of the precession of the equinoxes is usually attributed in the west to the Hellenistic-era (2nd century BC) astronomer, Hipparchus, although there are claims of its earlier discovery, such as in the Indian text, Vedanga Jyotisha, dating from 700 BC.[citation needed] With improvements in the ability to calculate the gravitational force between and among planets during the first half of the nineteenth century, it was recognized that the ecliptic itself moved slightly, which was named planetary precession, as early as 1863, while the dominant component was named lunisolar precession.[3] Their combination was named general precession, instead of precession of the equinoxes.
Precessional movement of Earth. Earth rotates (white arrows) once a day around its rotational axis (red); this axis itself rotates slowly (white circle), completing a rotation in approximately 26,000 year
Here's the MAYAN calendar that defines the axial procession that ends in the north pole as the solidity of the "REALITY" of Northern polar proximity to the Northern hemisphere as can be seen as the polar circumference of the AXIAL PRECESSION .
Here's the MAYAN calendar that defines the axial procession that ends in the north pole as the solidity of the "REALITY" of Northern polar proximity to the Northern hemisphere as can be seen as the polar circumference of the AXIAL PRECESSION .
North polar certainty indicates the amount of flattening that occurs in planets ,stars and galaxies as the density of the photoelctric energy of some sort.