To understand that there are ways that language may be damaged just like the SYMBIOTIC nature of the EARTH's own LIVING language, you must first understand that there are some rules to which there is some way to understand the WHOLENESS of the EARTH and yet be able to speak it's language in space while on Missions to Earth orbits or to other planets and star systems.
article by Henryk Szubinski
The rules are defined in the SOUND CHANGE.
from
Wikipedia
date 2018
October 27
Sound change includes any processes of language change that affect pronunciation (phonetic change) or sound system structures (phonological change). Sound change can consist of the replacement of one speech sound (or, more generally, one phonetic feature value) by another, the complete loss of the affected sound, or even the introduction of a new sound in a place where there had been none. Sound changes can be environmentally conditioned, meaning that the change only occurs in a defined sound environment, whereas in other environments the same speech sound is not affected by the change. The term "sound change" refers to diachronic changes—that is, irreversible changes in a language's sound system over time; "alternation", on the other hand, refers to changes that happen synchronically (i.e. within the language of an individual speaker, depending on the neighboring sounds) and which do not change the language's underlying system (for example, the -s in the English plural can be pronounced differently depending on what sound it follows, as in bet[s], bed[z]; this is a form of alternation, rather than sound change). However, since "sound change" can refer to the historical introduction of an alternation (such as post-vocalic /k/ in Tuscan—once [k] as in di [k]arlo 'of Carlo', but now [h] di [h]arlo, alternating with [k] in other positions: con [k]arlo 'with Carlo')—the label is inherently imprecise and often must be clarified as referring to phonemic change or restructuring.
Research on sound change is usually conducted on the working assumption that it is regular, which means that it is expected to apply mechanically whenever its structural conditions are met, irrespective of any non-phonological factors (such as the meaning of the words affected). However, apparent exceptions to regular change can occur—due to dialect borrowing, grammatical analogy, or other causes known and unknown—and some changes are described as "sporadic", meaning that they affect only one particular word or a few words, without any apparent regularity.
The Neogrammarian linguists of the 19th century introduced the term "sound law" to refer to rules of regular change, perhaps in imitation of the laws of physics.[1] and the term "law" is still used in referring to specific sound rules named after their authors, such as Grimm's Law, Grassmann's Law, etc.. Real-world sound changes often admit exceptions; nevertheless, the expectation of their regularity or absence of exceptions is of great heuristic value, since it allows historical linguists to define the notion of regular correspondence (see: comparative method).
Each sound change is limited in space and time. This means it functions within a limited area (within certain dialects) and during a limited period of time. For these (and other) reasons, the term "sound law" has been criticized for implying a universality that is unrealistic with regard to sound change.[2]
Sound change that affects the phonological system, in the number or distribution of its phonemes, is covered more fully at phonological change.
So you need to know the:
Terms for changes in pronunciation
in which the SYMBIOTIC method of using the DREAM LANGUAGE of EARTH's EXISTENCE.
NASALIZATION is one of the terms and you may read it with the other terms in the FULL ARTICLE
from Wikipedia , on SOUND CHANGE.
- Nasalization: Vowels followed by nasal consonants can become nasalized. If the nasal consonant is lost but the vowel retains its nasalized pronunciation, nasalization becomes phonemic, that is, distinctive. Example: French "-in" words used to be pronounced [in], but are now pronounced [ɛ̃], and the [n] is no longer pronounced (except in cases of liaison).
So in this way the LANGUAGE may be defined.
The ASTRONAUT NASAL CONSONANTS are distinct when astronauts are in zero gravity and the sound and flow of O2 changes the way we sound when speaking with the GROUND "CONTROL CENTER" of space missions.
The most important asset in being an astronaut is the communication with other parts of the NASA mission functions. So to be able to know how the SOUND CHANGE will effect the SOUND of ASTRONAUTS COMMUNICATING together, need be defined beforehand , as we displace to MARS to define the INNER GEOLOGICAL STRUCTURE and how it ALTERS the O2 , oxygen INFLUENCE on COMMUNICATING VOCALLY.
In this way the SOUNDS may become vocal or nasal in their interactions with communication with EARTH.
Important because we are already on the MARS INSIGHT MISSION with the 2 000 000 names on the chip
on it that will define our ability to RELATE to our NAMES as the SOUND alterations that will effect the future of
identity and how to DEFINE it in terms of the gravity influence on the HUMAN SOUND.
Mars geology may have some O2 related to Gravity and this in turn effects the VOCAL ABILITY as the SOUND FREQUENCY in some type of MODULATION with the amounts of CHANGE of them as one rotates in orbit around MARS from some special position of the MAGNETIC RESONANCE frequency of the MARS CORE that may effect the way we sound in position around MARS and on the planet.
The speed of sound compared with Earth and MArs
from Aerospace.
from Aerospace.
from:
http://www.planetary.org/explore/projects/microphones/sounds-on-mars.html
date 2018
October 27
What would humans sound like on Mars?Suppose you found yourself on Mars without a spacesuit. What would you say? Probably "Help!" because the air is more than 100 times thinner than Earth's, far too thin to breathe, and, furthermore, it's primarily carbon dioxide, a nasty toxin.
Your understandably poignant plea wouldn't go far in the Martian air, which will mute even the loudest screams to near whispers. Stranger still, your voice would be lower pitched than on Earth because of the lower sound speed. But suppose, suspending disbelief for a short while, that you really could speak on Mars. How would you sound?
read the whole article on the site:
www.planetary.org/explore/projects/microphones/sounds-on-mars.html
Here are the sounds of MARS recorded from the MARS ROVER.
They are probably from the WHEELS and this in turn indicates the SURFACE INTERACTIONS as the
SPEED of the wheels may translate into SOUND values by dividing the rotation time with the surface angles
in change:
Sound (rotation speed) / change of angles of the S:A=
the variables of the ROVER BEING related to it's position as 1
so then:
Sound f(frequency) / S.A angle = 1
any extra sounds would be:
f/S.A angle =1+-x
http://www.planetary.org/explore/projects/microphones/sounds-on-mars.html
date 2018
October 27
What would humans sound like on Mars?Suppose you found yourself on Mars without a spacesuit. What would you say? Probably "Help!" because the air is more than 100 times thinner than Earth's, far too thin to breathe, and, furthermore, it's primarily carbon dioxide, a nasty toxin.
Your understandably poignant plea wouldn't go far in the Martian air, which will mute even the loudest screams to near whispers. Stranger still, your voice would be lower pitched than on Earth because of the lower sound speed. But suppose, suspending disbelief for a short while, that you really could speak on Mars. How would you sound?
read the whole article on the site:
www.planetary.org/explore/projects/microphones/sounds-on-mars.html
Here are the sounds of MARS recorded from the MARS ROVER.
They are probably from the WHEELS and this in turn indicates the SURFACE INTERACTIONS as the
SPEED of the wheels may translate into SOUND values by dividing the rotation time with the surface angles
in change:
Sound (rotation speed) / change of angles of the S:A=
the variables of the ROVER BEING related to it's position as 1
so then:
Sound f(frequency) / S.A angle = 1
any extra sounds would be:
f/S.A angle =1+-x
more on BIRDS and the need to fly.On MARS and the MARS landings with astronauts and their SENSE PERCEPTION of being displaced from Earth to MARS.
As related to the "Eagle has landed" and the facts of BIRDS in general.
Evolution has made it so that Eagles do not have hands as they do have claws. So when you observe an eagle it does not have the sense perception of effecting it's environment like we humans have. Basically , we humans developed the ability of TOOL use and later on, the use of SPECIALIZATION of hand usage as DIGITAL SPECIALIZATION . So while we are able to effect the FLUID ENVIRONMENT of the WOMB , birds do not. That is why they are hatched in an egg and their way continues to use their wings to displace through the UNAFFECTED perception of motion through the MEDIUM of AIR as the fluidity that they ORIENTATE IN as they flap their wings is guided by the PREREQUISITE of the direction of the AIR CURRENTS rather than COGNITIVE control of the air flow.
So then, the problems that Kennedy had in reference to the use of ARMSTRONG ,ALDRIN , COLLINS as astronauts, may have been that of the relationships of SPECIALIZATION of the evolution of the HANDS and how they extended over the GAP of EARTH and the Moon or as to other planets such as MARS.
As such we definitely EVOLVED beyond the REPTILIAN stage when we displaced into space to other bodies in space.
That the eagle had landed implies also that the eagle had flown and that it had lifted.
In terms of this INSTINCT to lift and land, the EAGLE may have the sense of being awake to the MEDIUM of air and the way it takes hold of it's wings as soon as it hatches from it's EGG.
So in this sense that the EAGLE has "landed" also implies that the sense of returning to it's new place, the Moon, implies that there will be more USES of the "EAGLE" in the LANDINGS with astronauts on MARS.
Because it is the first NON REFERENCE to anything but the way the Eagle displaces to positions where new eagles HATCH without it sounding to STRANGE to be perceived.
What is for certain, is that there will be another USA flag placed on the surface of MARS.Who gets there first is not so much the question, rather ,the difficulty of the mission and the way that astronauts will have to interact together to get the flag on MARS.
The USA flag has already been shown together with the MARS surface as with the VIKING 1 mission.
So then, the way that , "The eagle has landed" on the Moon may be visualized with MARS also as EAGLE and
it's new place as the HATCHING effect.
So then, the way that , "The eagle has landed" on the Moon may be visualized with MARS also as EAGLE and
it's new place as the HATCHING effect.