I've experienced this many times, that the most common question to myself is directed to somebody by way of the comment, "what do you think" about this or that.
So our subconscious is alive in this context of wanting attention to oneself for having some facts and this attention needs reaffirmation back to us as we begin to sense that we are important.
the way some things open and other things keep the channel open as regards the "mind commentary" and the particle sharing that "atom computers" represent.
So everything could be such a question and answer that is also an "answer to a question" in terms of the "thinking computers" that use atoms to talk to each other. While keeping the attention awake in the third part of the interactions the result could be= an answer for an answer or "a question for a question".
When having this insight, the interaction becomes fun, you may have any number of questions and any number of answers and they may all be related to by the "computer subconscious" that may interact with the user of the telephone by inputting conscious or aware "questions and answers " to get the talker to relate to any of the subconscious levels as the variables may rotate an intelligent atom in one direction or another and then the third rotation as neutral and in the balance with the subconscious and the conscious as another 3 points that are basically centered.
So the intelligent atoms could be in the subconscious of the brain as "already there" in physical shape and then to construct it would be easy as physics to which to observe the brain would be to mimik it and get the "intelligent atom" as part of our brain that uses some "particle " in vibration.
To use the world as a telephone would be as such, the observation of the brain atom and then the reference to the part of the brain used to define the change from subconscious to the conscious and in this way the 2 way interactions may be as intelligent as such a intelligent system of learning about " what do you think about my..." and an infinite variety of learning of the "total openess" .
So how do we share the work load of our various relations to each other?.
The basics of this is that the "a.i or the intelligent atom computer as the human brain" may relate to alternate events of the inner "as yet unanswered" to the "current process " having an answer in front of our self"
So how do we turn this around to the; "subconscious as being answered" and the "conscious mind " as unanswered.
To know the triangulation of the inner atom as "the quiet" responses that are unknown by the subconscious and the conscious because it alternates between them ,so the thinking atom may be found on some frequency that is already thinking about us and our responses. This signal of evolution is our "intelligence" and it is = the origin of our species as observing the "evolution of our subconscious to observe the speciation of the conscious. Meaning we have as humans, a atom in our conscious that was present when we changed from neanderthal to modern human or from homo sapiens to modern man.So it must be a part of our evolution where we know that going from better to worse is not a problem because we may work out the answer and the way from worse to better, is usually the "shared responses" where our "mind atoms" are observable. So that would be the way to find this particle.
We know it is the "shared advantage".
When i was at home i would always look at some other person sitting beside me while i was looking at tv and i thought that i was really cool to get that response of someone looking back and smiling, thinking that, "yes i thinks that really cool also".
Actually it was not always the response , because people want to watch tv not see a visual commentary beside them, taking the attention of the whole film on the "sense of the visual on the side as having the sum of the whole film" . So at some point you are going to add the "voice commentary" where you say" yes i think that the film is good" for example and then you say that " I'm just as good as the super hero in the movie" but it goes unnoticed and goes into the subconscious mind and it needs to be confirmed .
It's right there in front of you so why not share.
Everyone has some position ,as our planet grows these positions will get closer to each other.
So in this way i think that "atom computers that are like humans " will be a bit like the "person sitting beside you in the movies that comments on everything" that you want to experience for yourself. But how do we know that there is a self and a "non self" in this example?. It's probably because when we "brag about something" we are in fact in the "conscious mind" and the "subconscious is the self as it wants to be in a personal relationship with it's discoveries". But the movie is already a fact and so too is the direction of it and the recording. We are just watching something that is already there. So the "commentary on the side may be important in that there is a need to see it from another angle, something the director forgot , and this is the conscious in the subconscious.
So one person is interested and another person is sensing the moment of sharing.
When i think about this "commentary response" im thinking about the short term memory and the long term memory as the inner "commentary". So i got this response; "Yes it's happening " as the basic rewards of the "inner observer" that must exist in between the "conscious and the subconscious". It is this that defines the "thinking atom"of a.i.
The image below shows the "intervals" as
attention= retreival
and:
encoding = input
so the thinking atom has to be the, "output of short term memory" as it's indicator, the way it is found by the "rehersal" of the commentary "specific knowledge"we need to "noticed in the human relations and atom thinking computers".
It shows the difference between being the "commentary to someone sitting beside you while watching a movie and commenting or needing reaffirmation " as the commentary data is the long term memory "version" of the "data that is already there in the movie screen " and the short term memory is there because the "commentary knows that the input of the long term memory facts" are what is encoded and which the person sitting beside you ,"has to input it" into his or her short term memory because there is no other way to get both sides of the story to make sense.We cannot live without such relational interactions, they were once part of our evolution.
When you have the atom of a computer that works with 3 such particles you may hold the answer to each other.
.
Here are some clues of the type 1 as it changes to type 2 web phone and short term and long term memory.
many scifi movies exists between the worlds of ,"possible", and "real", in a type 2 to type 3 kardavesh scale civilization". Meaning it is between the use of stars as resources and also as "creating stars" but it is also in the faze change of the "creation of galactic resources" of the type 3 civilization.
The way that the star wars galaxy interacts is by way of "hologramic technology" that shows the advanced levels of intelligence as shared between every star system and the rule of the "force" as some type of "force field" that keeps the holograms functioning and that they "show the way" between stellar and galactic civilizations".
We will hold planets and stars and galaxies in the type 123 change as the atoms in the intelligent "atom computers".So we will learn to mix them and create ourselves as "projected spherical data".
What is it to hold one such sphere?.
The current computational power is so great that it can do the man hours of work into infinity.
There are so many specific working special sections that the total time of every worker and the the input made was equal to more time that the whole planet as the opposite end of the work power, to describe one person in whole with everything being thought and so on.
meta data and the one person reference: Holding atom number 2.
It evolved on a scheme that had to have digital computer systems to keep track of the stages in the move to get the "continuity right". In this way the computers worked as many work hours as the artists but each level had a new difficulty in which the computer had to square, then cube and then exp to 4 and exp to 5 and so on. So the time that the computer was working could be longer than one planetary year of work for one persons total "meta data facts".
holding atom 3:of the thinking computer.
as regards the scifi movies:
So then, this defines the "long term memory" while the input of the "commentary" to the film by a new commentary of the "long term" is equal to the memories of those who worked on the film. So when "the commentary sitting beside you in the movie screen is inputting this long term memory as a response". Meaning that the flash of "insight" the commentator is giving you as "short term memory" = the "why" of the movie, meaning the scifi science as real science.Remembering that the commentary may be some person you are haring the viewing with who is in the long term memory 2 and creates the short term memory response=1/2
The facts of the "galactic or stellar net" as the indicator of emotion has some problems related to the "negative emotions " being the "sides" and the positive emotions of the commentator are = the lite side of the force.As symbiotic = 1/2
So each of these created sides in the Kardavesh scale on the level of 2.5 type and the way between them as between the stellar civilization and the galactic as the difference of 0.5.
to hold the 3 atoms of a thinking computer is like holding the "short term memory as one and the long term memory as the other" with the third atom as the "conscious and subconscious.
image credit
hip wallpaper
So our subconscious is alive in this context of wanting attention to oneself for having some facts and this attention needs reaffirmation back to us as we begin to sense that we are important.
the way some things open and other things keep the channel open as regards the "mind commentary" and the particle sharing that "atom computers" represent.
So everything could be such a question and answer that is also an "answer to a question" in terms of the "thinking computers" that use atoms to talk to each other. While keeping the attention awake in the third part of the interactions the result could be= an answer for an answer or "a question for a question".
When having this insight, the interaction becomes fun, you may have any number of questions and any number of answers and they may all be related to by the "computer subconscious" that may interact with the user of the telephone by inputting conscious or aware "questions and answers " to get the talker to relate to any of the subconscious levels as the variables may rotate an intelligent atom in one direction or another and then the third rotation as neutral and in the balance with the subconscious and the conscious as another 3 points that are basically centered.
So the intelligent atoms could be in the subconscious of the brain as "already there" in physical shape and then to construct it would be easy as physics to which to observe the brain would be to mimik it and get the "intelligent atom" as part of our brain that uses some "particle " in vibration.
To use the world as a telephone would be as such, the observation of the brain atom and then the reference to the part of the brain used to define the change from subconscious to the conscious and in this way the 2 way interactions may be as intelligent as such a intelligent system of learning about " what do you think about my..." and an infinite variety of learning of the "total openess" .
So how do we share the work load of our various relations to each other?.
The basics of this is that the "a.i or the intelligent atom computer as the human brain" may relate to alternate events of the inner "as yet unanswered" to the "current process " having an answer in front of our self"
So how do we turn this around to the; "subconscious as being answered" and the "conscious mind " as unanswered.
To know the triangulation of the inner atom as "the quiet" responses that are unknown by the subconscious and the conscious because it alternates between them ,so the thinking atom may be found on some frequency that is already thinking about us and our responses. This signal of evolution is our "intelligence" and it is = the origin of our species as observing the "evolution of our subconscious to observe the speciation of the conscious. Meaning we have as humans, a atom in our conscious that was present when we changed from neanderthal to modern human or from homo sapiens to modern man.So it must be a part of our evolution where we know that going from better to worse is not a problem because we may work out the answer and the way from worse to better, is usually the "shared responses" where our "mind atoms" are observable. So that would be the way to find this particle.
We know it is the "shared advantage".
When i was at home i would always look at some other person sitting beside me while i was looking at tv and i thought that i was really cool to get that response of someone looking back and smiling, thinking that, "yes i thinks that really cool also".
Actually it was not always the response , because people want to watch tv not see a visual commentary beside them, taking the attention of the whole film on the "sense of the visual on the side as having the sum of the whole film" . So at some point you are going to add the "voice commentary" where you say" yes i think that the film is good" for example and then you say that " I'm just as good as the super hero in the movie" but it goes unnoticed and goes into the subconscious mind and it needs to be confirmed .
It's right there in front of you so why not share.
Everyone has some position ,as our planet grows these positions will get closer to each other.
So in this way i think that "atom computers that are like humans " will be a bit like the "person sitting beside you in the movies that comments on everything" that you want to experience for yourself. But how do we know that there is a self and a "non self" in this example?. It's probably because when we "brag about something" we are in fact in the "conscious mind" and the "subconscious is the self as it wants to be in a personal relationship with it's discoveries". But the movie is already a fact and so too is the direction of it and the recording. We are just watching something that is already there. So the "commentary on the side may be important in that there is a need to see it from another angle, something the director forgot , and this is the conscious in the subconscious.
So one person is interested and another person is sensing the moment of sharing.
When i think about this "commentary response" im thinking about the short term memory and the long term memory as the inner "commentary". So i got this response; "Yes it's happening " as the basic rewards of the "inner observer" that must exist in between the "conscious and the subconscious". It is this that defines the "thinking atom"of a.i.
The image below shows the "intervals" as
attention= retreival
and:
encoding = input
so the thinking atom has to be the, "output of short term memory" as it's indicator, the way it is found by the "rehersal" of the commentary "specific knowledge"we need to "noticed in the human relations and atom thinking computers".
It shows the difference between being the "commentary to someone sitting beside you while watching a movie and commenting or needing reaffirmation " as the commentary data is the long term memory "version" of the "data that is already there in the movie screen " and the short term memory is there because the "commentary knows that the input of the long term memory facts" are what is encoded and which the person sitting beside you ,"has to input it" into his or her short term memory because there is no other way to get both sides of the story to make sense.We cannot live without such relational interactions, they were once part of our evolution.
When you have the atom of a computer that works with 3 such particles you may hold the answer to each other.
.
Here are some clues of the type 1 as it changes to type 2 web phone and short term and long term memory.
many scifi movies exists between the worlds of ,"possible", and "real", in a type 2 to type 3 kardavesh scale civilization". Meaning it is between the use of stars as resources and also as "creating stars" but it is also in the faze change of the "creation of galactic resources" of the type 3 civilization.
The way that the star wars galaxy interacts is by way of "hologramic technology" that shows the advanced levels of intelligence as shared between every star system and the rule of the "force" as some type of "force field" that keeps the holograms functioning and that they "show the way" between stellar and galactic civilizations".
We will hold planets and stars and galaxies in the type 123 change as the atoms in the intelligent "atom computers".So we will learn to mix them and create ourselves as "projected spherical data".
What is it to hold one such sphere?.
The current computational power is so great that it can do the man hours of work into infinity.
There are so many specific working special sections that the total time of every worker and the the input made was equal to more time that the whole planet as the opposite end of the work power, to describe one person in whole with everything being thought and so on.
meta data and the one person reference: Holding atom number 2.
It evolved on a scheme that had to have digital computer systems to keep track of the stages in the move to get the "continuity right". In this way the computers worked as many work hours as the artists but each level had a new difficulty in which the computer had to square, then cube and then exp to 4 and exp to 5 and so on. So the time that the computer was working could be longer than one planetary year of work for one persons total "meta data facts".
holding atom 3:of the thinking computer.
as regards the scifi movies:
So then, this defines the "long term memory" while the input of the "commentary" to the film by a new commentary of the "long term" is equal to the memories of those who worked on the film. So when "the commentary sitting beside you in the movie screen is inputting this long term memory as a response". Meaning that the flash of "insight" the commentator is giving you as "short term memory" = the "why" of the movie, meaning the scifi science as real science.Remembering that the commentary may be some person you are haring the viewing with who is in the long term memory 2 and creates the short term memory response=1/2
The facts of the "galactic or stellar net" as the indicator of emotion has some problems related to the "negative emotions " being the "sides" and the positive emotions of the commentator are = the lite side of the force.As symbiotic = 1/2
So each of these created sides in the Kardavesh scale on the level of 2.5 type and the way between them as between the stellar civilization and the galactic as the difference of 0.5.
to hold the 3 atoms of a thinking computer is like holding the "short term memory as one and the long term memory as the other" with the third atom as the "conscious and subconscious.
image credit
hip wallpaper
What is short and long term memory:
Important information is gradually transferred fromshort-term memory into long-term memory. ... Most people think of long-term memory when they think of "memory" itself -- but most experts believe information must first pass through sensory and short-term memory before it can be stored as a long-term memory.
image credit:
crystandsam.weebly.com
credit:
www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/for-better-or-for-worse
for better or (for) worse• And for better or worse, the new interactivity brings enormous political leverage to ordinarycitizens at relatively little cost.• He has toted the ball and the expectations, for better or worse.• All five, for better or worse, have received recent votes of confidence from their respectivegeneral managers or team presidents.• He was her husband ... for better or worse, he was her husband.• Medical students in prolonged contact with junior doctors learn attitudes by example, for better or for worse.• Today we know for better or for worse that cops, like doctors and priests, are merely human.• Decisions made in any of these places can hit our pocketbooks and our peace of mind, for better or for worse.• And the consequences could be even more startling, for better or for worse.• The reality is that, for better or worse, the world of publishing has changed.
image redit:
pinterest.com
www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/for-better-or-for-worse
for better or (for) worse• And for better or worse, the new interactivity brings enormous political leverage to ordinarycitizens at relatively little cost.• He has toted the ball and the expectations, for better or worse.• All five, for better or worse, have received recent votes of confidence from their respectivegeneral managers or team presidents.• He was her husband ... for better or worse, he was her husband.• Medical students in prolonged contact with junior doctors learn attitudes by example, for better or for worse.• Today we know for better or for worse that cops, like doctors and priests, are merely human.• Decisions made in any of these places can hit our pocketbooks and our peace of mind, for better or for worse.• And the consequences could be even more startling, for better or for worse.• The reality is that, for better or worse, the world of publishing has changed.
image redit:
pinterest.com
The conscious mind involves all of the things that you are currently aware of and thinking about. ... The preconscious mind, also known as the subconscious mind, includes things that we might not be presently aware of but that we can pull intoconscious awareness when needed.