Ending illegal secrecy on the movie "2012".
And some data on Hawking's information's paradox.
And some data on Hawking's information's paradox.
from Wikipedia
date 2017
November 03
2012 is a 2009 American epic disaster film directed by Roland Emmerich, and stars John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Amanda Peet, Oliver Platt, Thandie Newton, Danny Glover and Woody Harrelson. The film was produced by Centropolis Entertainmentand distributed by Columbia Pictures.[1]
Filming, originally planned for Los Angeles, began in Vancouver in August 2008.[4] The plot follows novelist Jackson Curtis as he attempts to bring his family to safety amid a worldwide geological disaster. The film refers to Mayanism and the 2012 phenomenon in its portrayal of cataclysmic events.
The special project ships made to handle the large amounts of paying survivors to float to the top of the World by way of the ocean level that has started to increase height so that only this type of special ships could make it.
The concept here, then ,describes the use of HULL markings that indicate the amount of weight that a ship can hold while being buoyant .
In the case of the 2012 movie and the ships shown there, the buoyancy level would be more than 100 times larger due to the increased gravity of the oceans at the level shown in the movie.
So how to define this need for clarity on the amount that such a ship could hold and not sink.
And how would this be described in terms of HULL MARKINGS.
the SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTS in the MOVIE.
The sea level does rise to the height of the Himalaya mountains in the move, so what would the buoyancy be at that level?.
It would have to be higher than the weight of every land on the planet and also the stability to keep itself on the ocean bottom
for support while not breaking the ocean bottom and break the surface and fall into the outer mantle. So something has to
be able to handle this weight of water as being greater than the action reaction =1 of the lands action reaction=2 by which some
particle indicator in the movie shows how this could happen in terms of the small gap between the 1 and 2 as the
expansion =1 and contraction =2
so that the gap could be the 1/2+S =e+
as the displacement through this gap and the electron value from friction as e+ that heats the inside of the Earth due to the
opposite as
2/1 =2+S=e-
the action reaction of the Earth's core would be e+ squared
and any instability of the 1/2 action reaction would have to be
the square as it's differencial =d1
e+=action reaction d1.
As the element of water or that of the Earth's surface or that of the inner Earth or the
d1 of the layer between space and the atmosphere?.
Which came first?.d1, or d2 or d3 or d4?.
as the total 10 d as the first singularity differencial.
So what is this d1 value and can it be measured? and what does this mean in relation to the language of the HULL MARKINGS(seen later).But first "What is the singularity differencial?"Could the information's paradox of Hawking's define the artificial human constructs that must be stronger than anything found in nature. Because the universe is also natural.So that one bit of information from humans or aliens, that is totally strange to space, planets and stars, because these do not think, but rather the concept from humans does because it is totally artificial.
Does Hawking's know what he's talking about?
Maybe.
In terms of the power of the universe as energy, the infromation's paradox does not really survive nature because it is weaker that the whole universe .But is it?.
Why did Hawking's work on black holes? and has human artificiality become stronger than universal bodies and their natural "non selection".
The fact that we know what begins and ends the universe also includes our use of it. While doing this it is so that the universe will not end or begin because of it right now.
So information ,according to Hawking's , in space must be able to last the moment without the instance of fact occurring just by stating fact because fact has artificial origins that are related to natural selection.
from Wikipedia
date 2017
November 03.
In the movie the cause of the Earth's problem is a moving particle in the center of the Earth that has been seeping out from between the layers of the Earth's inner and outer mantle, or so the story goes.
In mathematics, in the theory of ordinary differential equations in the complex plane {\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }, the points of {\displaystyle \mathbb {C} } are classified into ordinary points, at which the equation's coefficients are analytic functions, and singular points, at which some coefficient has a singularity. Then amongst singular points, an important distinction is made between a regular singular point, where the growth of solutions is bounded (in any small sector) by an algebraic function, and an irregular singular point, where the full solution set requires functions with higher growth rates. This distinction occurs, for example, between the hypergeometric equation, with three regular singular points, and the Bessel equation which is in a sense a limiting case, but where the analytic properties are substantially different.
In the theory of ordinary differential equations, a movable singularity is a point where the solution of the equation behaves badly and which is "movable" in the sense that its location depends on the initial conditions of the differential equation.[1] Suppose we have an ordinary differential equation in the complex domain. Any given solution y(x) of this equation may well have singularities at various points (i.e. points at which it is not a regular holomorphic function, such as branch points, essential singularities or poles). A singular point is said to be movable if its location depends on the particular solution we have chosen, rather than being fixed by the equation itself.
Could the singularity be anything that is made by humans as artificial and able to withstand the forces of nature. May singularity differencials be like
Hawking's information paradox of gravity as the sum of singularity differencials as
1d+2d+3d+4d=10 d ?.
date 2017
November 03
2012 is a 2009 American epic disaster film directed by Roland Emmerich, and stars John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Amanda Peet, Oliver Platt, Thandie Newton, Danny Glover and Woody Harrelson. The film was produced by Centropolis Entertainmentand distributed by Columbia Pictures.[1]
Filming, originally planned for Los Angeles, began in Vancouver in August 2008.[4] The plot follows novelist Jackson Curtis as he attempts to bring his family to safety amid a worldwide geological disaster. The film refers to Mayanism and the 2012 phenomenon in its portrayal of cataclysmic events.
The special project ships made to handle the large amounts of paying survivors to float to the top of the World by way of the ocean level that has started to increase height so that only this type of special ships could make it.
The concept here, then ,describes the use of HULL markings that indicate the amount of weight that a ship can hold while being buoyant .
In the case of the 2012 movie and the ships shown there, the buoyancy level would be more than 100 times larger due to the increased gravity of the oceans at the level shown in the movie.
So how to define this need for clarity on the amount that such a ship could hold and not sink.
And how would this be described in terms of HULL MARKINGS.
the SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTS in the MOVIE.
The sea level does rise to the height of the Himalaya mountains in the move, so what would the buoyancy be at that level?.
It would have to be higher than the weight of every land on the planet and also the stability to keep itself on the ocean bottom
for support while not breaking the ocean bottom and break the surface and fall into the outer mantle. So something has to
be able to handle this weight of water as being greater than the action reaction =1 of the lands action reaction=2 by which some
particle indicator in the movie shows how this could happen in terms of the small gap between the 1 and 2 as the
expansion =1 and contraction =2
so that the gap could be the 1/2+S =e+
as the displacement through this gap and the electron value from friction as e+ that heats the inside of the Earth due to the
opposite as
2/1 =2+S=e-
the action reaction of the Earth's core would be e+ squared
and any instability of the 1/2 action reaction would have to be
the square as it's differencial =d1
e+=action reaction d1.
As the element of water or that of the Earth's surface or that of the inner Earth or the
d1 of the layer between space and the atmosphere?.
Which came first?.d1, or d2 or d3 or d4?.
as the total 10 d as the first singularity differencial.
So what is this d1 value and can it be measured? and what does this mean in relation to the language of the HULL MARKINGS(seen later).But first "What is the singularity differencial?"Could the information's paradox of Hawking's define the artificial human constructs that must be stronger than anything found in nature. Because the universe is also natural.So that one bit of information from humans or aliens, that is totally strange to space, planets and stars, because these do not think, but rather the concept from humans does because it is totally artificial.
Does Hawking's know what he's talking about?
Maybe.
In terms of the power of the universe as energy, the infromation's paradox does not really survive nature because it is weaker that the whole universe .But is it?.
Why did Hawking's work on black holes? and has human artificiality become stronger than universal bodies and their natural "non selection".
The fact that we know what begins and ends the universe also includes our use of it. While doing this it is so that the universe will not end or begin because of it right now.
So information ,according to Hawking's , in space must be able to last the moment without the instance of fact occurring just by stating fact because fact has artificial origins that are related to natural selection.
from Wikipedia
date 2017
November 03.
In the movie the cause of the Earth's problem is a moving particle in the center of the Earth that has been seeping out from between the layers of the Earth's inner and outer mantle, or so the story goes.
In mathematics, in the theory of ordinary differential equations in the complex plane {\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }, the points of {\displaystyle \mathbb {C} } are classified into ordinary points, at which the equation's coefficients are analytic functions, and singular points, at which some coefficient has a singularity. Then amongst singular points, an important distinction is made between a regular singular point, where the growth of solutions is bounded (in any small sector) by an algebraic function, and an irregular singular point, where the full solution set requires functions with higher growth rates. This distinction occurs, for example, between the hypergeometric equation, with three regular singular points, and the Bessel equation which is in a sense a limiting case, but where the analytic properties are substantially different.
In the theory of ordinary differential equations, a movable singularity is a point where the solution of the equation behaves badly and which is "movable" in the sense that its location depends on the initial conditions of the differential equation.[1] Suppose we have an ordinary differential equation in the complex domain. Any given solution y(x) of this equation may well have singularities at various points (i.e. points at which it is not a regular holomorphic function, such as branch points, essential singularities or poles). A singular point is said to be movable if its location depends on the particular solution we have chosen, rather than being fixed by the equation itself.
Could the singularity be anything that is made by humans as artificial and able to withstand the forces of nature. May singularity differencials be like
Hawking's information paradox of gravity as the sum of singularity differencials as
1d+2d+3d+4d=10 d ?.
from Wikipedia
2017
November 03
In physics, buoyancy ( /ˈbɔɪ.ənsi, -əntsi/[1][2] or /ˈbuːjənsi, -jəntsi/;[1][2]) or upthrust, is an upward force exerted by a fluid that opposes the weight of an immersed object. In a column of fluid, pressure increases with depth as a result of the weight of the overlying fluid. Thus the pressure at the bottom of a column of fluid is greater than at the top of the column. Similarly, the pressure at the bottom of an object submerged in a fluid is greater than at the top of the object. This pressure difference results in a net upwards force on the object. The magnitude of that force exerted is proportional to that pressure difference, and (as explained by Archimedes' principle) is equivalent to the weight of the fluid that would otherwise occupy the volume of the object, i.e. the displaced fluid.
For this reason, an object whose density is greater than that of the fluid in which it is submerged tends to sink. If the object is either less dense than the liquid or is shaped appropriately (as in a boat), the force can keep the object afloat. This can occur only in a non-inertial reference frame, which either has a gravitational field or is accelerating due to a force other than gravity defining a "downward" direction. In a situation of fluid statics, the net upward buoyancy force is equal to the magnitude of the weight of fluid displaced by the body.[3]
The center of buoyancy of an object is the centroid of the displaced volume of fluid.
2017
November 03
In physics, buoyancy ( /ˈbɔɪ.ənsi, -əntsi/[1][2] or /ˈbuːjənsi, -jəntsi/;[1][2]) or upthrust, is an upward force exerted by a fluid that opposes the weight of an immersed object. In a column of fluid, pressure increases with depth as a result of the weight of the overlying fluid. Thus the pressure at the bottom of a column of fluid is greater than at the top of the column. Similarly, the pressure at the bottom of an object submerged in a fluid is greater than at the top of the object. This pressure difference results in a net upwards force on the object. The magnitude of that force exerted is proportional to that pressure difference, and (as explained by Archimedes' principle) is equivalent to the weight of the fluid that would otherwise occupy the volume of the object, i.e. the displaced fluid.
For this reason, an object whose density is greater than that of the fluid in which it is submerged tends to sink. If the object is either less dense than the liquid or is shaped appropriately (as in a boat), the force can keep the object afloat. This can occur only in a non-inertial reference frame, which either has a gravitational field or is accelerating due to a force other than gravity defining a "downward" direction. In a situation of fluid statics, the net upward buoyancy force is equal to the magnitude of the weight of fluid displaced by the body.[3]
The center of buoyancy of an object is the centroid of the displaced volume of fluid.
HULL MARKINGS
Load Line Markings. Easily the most cryptic markingyou'll see on the hull of your cruise ship is the Load Line marker. Typically located amidships, this marker is placed near the Plimsoll Line, also known as the point on the hull where the superstructure paint ends and the undersea anti-fouling paint begin
Load Line Markings. Easily the most cryptic markingyou'll see on the hull of your cruise ship is the Load Line marker. Typically located amidships, this marker is placed near the Plimsoll Line, also known as the point on the hull where the superstructure paint ends and the undersea anti-fouling paint begin
Would the Hull markings for the ships in the movie 2012 have the logical height levels as equal as the ocean and it's buoyancy could be universal ,meaning that the ocean size or height as depth could stay the same and keep any ship floating no matter how high up.
So there must be some knowledge on this in relation to the physics that humans have found on the Moon and the many voyages to other planets made by the Voyager space craft that could define this "language of the power of water and gravity that increases or decreases the stress levels on ships as they are to be made to float on top".
So there must be some knowledge on this in relation to the physics that humans have found on the Moon and the many voyages to other planets made by the Voyager space craft that could define this "language of the power of water and gravity that increases or decreases the stress levels on ships as they are to be made to float on top".
Would the HULL Markings indicate the actual level of the oceans as they are now and the change to a higher level that starts the weight being buoyant and then the actual height of the oceans as seen in the movie 2012.
This symbol stands for the "knights templars" or the "stonemasons".
So that some of the fiction in the movie "2012" and the involvance of "the Illuminati " could be true when defined in regards to their
safe keeping of treasures around the wold such as the "Mona Lisa " by Leonardo Da Vinci.
This symbol stands for the "knights templars" or the "stonemasons".
So that some of the fiction in the movie "2012" and the involvance of "the Illuminati " could be true when defined in regards to their
safe keeping of treasures around the wold such as the "Mona Lisa " by Leonardo Da Vinci.
The movie 2012 has some source of the organizing body that builds the special ships and the safety of those who can afford to be saved.
The organisation has the name " Institute of Human Continuity".
from
Wikipedia
2017
November 03
2012 was marketed by the fictional Institute for Human Continuity, featuring a book by Jackson Curtis (Farewell Atlantis),[5] streaming media, blog updates and radio broadcasts from zealot Charlie Frost on his website, This Is The End.[5] On November 12, 2008, the studio released the first trailer for 2012. With a tsunami surging over the Himalayas and a purportedly-scientific message that the world would end in 2012, the trailer's message was that international governments were not preparing their populations for the event. The trailer ended with a suggestion to viewers to "find out the truth" by entering "2012" on a search engine. The Guardian called the film's marketing "deeply flawed", associating it with "websites that make even more spurious claims about 2012".[21]
The studio introduced a viral marketing website operated by the Institute for Human Continuity, where filmgoers could register for a lottery number to be part of a small population which would be rescued from the global destruction.[6] David Morrison of NASA, who received over 1,000 inquiries from people who thought the website was genuine, condemned it. "I've even had cases of teenagers writing to me saying they are contemplating suicide because they don't want to see the world end", Morrison said. "I think when you lie on the internet and scare children to make a buck, that is ethically wrong."[22] Another marketing website promoted Farewell Atlantis, the fictional novel about the events of 2012.[5]
Comcast organized a "roadblock campaign" to promote the film in which a two-minute scene was broadcast on 450 American commercial television networks, local English-language and Spanish-language stations, and 89 cable outlets during a ten-minute window between 10:50 and 11:00 pm Eastern and Pacific Time on October 1, 2009.[23] The scene featured the destruction of Los Angeles and ended with a cliffhanger, with the entire 5:38 clip available on Comcast's Fancast website. According to Variety, "The stunt will put the footage in front of 90% of all households watching ad-supported TV, or nearly 110 million viewers. When combined with online and mobile streams, that could increase to more than 140 million".[23]
The organisation has the name " Institute of Human Continuity".
from
Wikipedia
2017
November 03
2012 was marketed by the fictional Institute for Human Continuity, featuring a book by Jackson Curtis (Farewell Atlantis),[5] streaming media, blog updates and radio broadcasts from zealot Charlie Frost on his website, This Is The End.[5] On November 12, 2008, the studio released the first trailer for 2012. With a tsunami surging over the Himalayas and a purportedly-scientific message that the world would end in 2012, the trailer's message was that international governments were not preparing their populations for the event. The trailer ended with a suggestion to viewers to "find out the truth" by entering "2012" on a search engine. The Guardian called the film's marketing "deeply flawed", associating it with "websites that make even more spurious claims about 2012".[21]
The studio introduced a viral marketing website operated by the Institute for Human Continuity, where filmgoers could register for a lottery number to be part of a small population which would be rescued from the global destruction.[6] David Morrison of NASA, who received over 1,000 inquiries from people who thought the website was genuine, condemned it. "I've even had cases of teenagers writing to me saying they are contemplating suicide because they don't want to see the world end", Morrison said. "I think when you lie on the internet and scare children to make a buck, that is ethically wrong."[22] Another marketing website promoted Farewell Atlantis, the fictional novel about the events of 2012.[5]
Comcast organized a "roadblock campaign" to promote the film in which a two-minute scene was broadcast on 450 American commercial television networks, local English-language and Spanish-language stations, and 89 cable outlets during a ten-minute window between 10:50 and 11:00 pm Eastern and Pacific Time on October 1, 2009.[23] The scene featured the destruction of Los Angeles and ended with a cliffhanger, with the entire 5:38 clip available on Comcast's Fancast website. According to Variety, "The stunt will put the footage in front of 90% of all households watching ad-supported TV, or nearly 110 million viewers. When combined with online and mobile streams, that could increase to more than 140 million".[23]