To know about space and the solar system we must begin at the point in European history where science of astronomy and royal rule
went together to create the age of enlightenment whereby the rule of the Sun was made by the Sun king and the point of view was
widely known as the origin of the ancient types of gods. In this way, when you think about the Sun, the data given here may help to
give you the relational point of view by which the science of astronomy and enlightenment went together.
by Henryk Szubinski
went together to create the age of enlightenment whereby the rule of the Sun was made by the Sun king and the point of view was
widely known as the origin of the ancient types of gods. In this way, when you think about the Sun, the data given here may help to
give you the relational point of view by which the science of astronomy and enlightenment went together.
by Henryk Szubinski
as related to the TWO DOORS as TWODOORS and TUDORS.
The relationship between the Sun king as Ludwig the 14 th and the Tudors may be understood as their comparisons to each other as the
highest royalties where the Sun king was Greek myth and the Merlin controlled all magic from Britain.Some disputes remain as to the
Sun king being the 15 th or the 14 th because most people did not want him remaining as the highest sovereign.The Sun king used
the "DIVINE RIGHT OF KINGS" to become APOLLO (the Sun king).Here then, the explanation of the divine right of kings.
from
Wikipedia
date 2017
December 02.
Louis XIV (5 September 1638 – 1 September 1715), known as Louis the Great (Louis le Grand) or the Sun King (le Roi Soleil), was a monarch of the House of Bourbon who reigned as King of France from 1643 until his death in 1715. Starting at the age of 5, his reign of 72 years and 110 days is the longest recorded of any monarch of a sovereign country in European history.[1][2] In the age of absolutism in Europe, Louis XIV's France was a leader in the growing centralization of power.[3]
Louis began his personal rule of France in 1661, after the death of his chief minister, the Italian Cardinal Mazarin.[4] An adherent of the concept of the divine right of kings, which advocates the divine origin of monarchical rule, Louis continued his predecessors' work of creating a centralized state governed from the capital. He sought to eliminate the remnants of feudalism persisting in parts of France and, by compelling many members of the nobility to inhabit his lavish Palace of Versailles (formerly a hunting lodge belonging to Louis' father), succeeded in pacifying the aristocracy, many members of which had participated in the Fronde rebellion during Louis' minority. By these means he became one of the most powerful French monarchs and consolidated a system of absolute monarchical rule in France that endured until the French Revolution.
from Wikipedia
date 2017
December 02
The House of Tudor was an English royal house of Welsh origin,[1] descended in the male line from the Tudors of Penmynydd. Tudor monarchs ruled the Kingdom of England and its realms, including their ancestral Wales and the Lordship of Ireland (later the Kingdom of Ireland) from 1485 until 1603, with five monarchs in that period. The Tudors succeeded the House of Plantagenet as rulers of the Kingdom of England, and were succeeded by the House of Stuart. The first Tudor monarch, Henry VII, descended through his mother from a legitimised branch of the English royal House of Lancaster. The Tudor family rose to power in the wake of the Wars of the Roses, which left the House of Lancaster, to which the Tudors were aligned, extinct.
Henry Tudor was able to establish himself as a candidate not only for traditional Lancastrian supporters, but also for the discontented supporters of their rival House of York, and he rose to the throne by the right of conquest. His victory at the Battle of Bosworth Field was reinforced by his marriage to Elizabeth of York, daughter of Edward IV, symbolically uniting the former warring factions under a new dynasty. The Tudors extended their power beyond modern England, achieving the full union of England and the Principality of Wales in 1542 (Laws in Wales Acts 1535 and 1542), and successfully asserting English authority over the Kingdom of Ireland. They also maintained the nominal English claim to the Kingdom of France; although none of them made substance of it, Henry VIII fought wars with France trying to reclaim that title. After him, his daughter Mary I lost control of all territory in France permanently with the fall of Calais in 1558.
In total, five Tudor monarchs ruled their domains for just over a century. Henry VIII was the only son of Henry VII to live to the age of maturity. Issues around the royal succession (including marriage and the succession rights of women) became major political themes during the Tudor era. The House of Stuart, descended from Henry VII's daughter Margaret, came to power in 1603 when Elizabeth Idied and the Tudor line failed.
The relationship between the Sun king as Ludwig the 14 th and the Tudors may be understood as their comparisons to each other as the
highest royalties where the Sun king was Greek myth and the Merlin controlled all magic from Britain.Some disputes remain as to the
Sun king being the 15 th or the 14 th because most people did not want him remaining as the highest sovereign.The Sun king used
the "DIVINE RIGHT OF KINGS" to become APOLLO (the Sun king).Here then, the explanation of the divine right of kings.
from
Wikipedia
date 2017
December 02.
Louis XIV (5 September 1638 – 1 September 1715), known as Louis the Great (Louis le Grand) or the Sun King (le Roi Soleil), was a monarch of the House of Bourbon who reigned as King of France from 1643 until his death in 1715. Starting at the age of 5, his reign of 72 years and 110 days is the longest recorded of any monarch of a sovereign country in European history.[1][2] In the age of absolutism in Europe, Louis XIV's France was a leader in the growing centralization of power.[3]
Louis began his personal rule of France in 1661, after the death of his chief minister, the Italian Cardinal Mazarin.[4] An adherent of the concept of the divine right of kings, which advocates the divine origin of monarchical rule, Louis continued his predecessors' work of creating a centralized state governed from the capital. He sought to eliminate the remnants of feudalism persisting in parts of France and, by compelling many members of the nobility to inhabit his lavish Palace of Versailles (formerly a hunting lodge belonging to Louis' father), succeeded in pacifying the aristocracy, many members of which had participated in the Fronde rebellion during Louis' minority. By these means he became one of the most powerful French monarchs and consolidated a system of absolute monarchical rule in France that endured until the French Revolution.
from Wikipedia
date 2017
December 02
The House of Tudor was an English royal house of Welsh origin,[1] descended in the male line from the Tudors of Penmynydd. Tudor monarchs ruled the Kingdom of England and its realms, including their ancestral Wales and the Lordship of Ireland (later the Kingdom of Ireland) from 1485 until 1603, with five monarchs in that period. The Tudors succeeded the House of Plantagenet as rulers of the Kingdom of England, and were succeeded by the House of Stuart. The first Tudor monarch, Henry VII, descended through his mother from a legitimised branch of the English royal House of Lancaster. The Tudor family rose to power in the wake of the Wars of the Roses, which left the House of Lancaster, to which the Tudors were aligned, extinct.
Henry Tudor was able to establish himself as a candidate not only for traditional Lancastrian supporters, but also for the discontented supporters of their rival House of York, and he rose to the throne by the right of conquest. His victory at the Battle of Bosworth Field was reinforced by his marriage to Elizabeth of York, daughter of Edward IV, symbolically uniting the former warring factions under a new dynasty. The Tudors extended their power beyond modern England, achieving the full union of England and the Principality of Wales in 1542 (Laws in Wales Acts 1535 and 1542), and successfully asserting English authority over the Kingdom of Ireland. They also maintained the nominal English claim to the Kingdom of France; although none of them made substance of it, Henry VIII fought wars with France trying to reclaim that title. After him, his daughter Mary I lost control of all territory in France permanently with the fall of Calais in 1558.
In total, five Tudor monarchs ruled their domains for just over a century. Henry VIII was the only son of Henry VII to live to the age of maturity. Issues around the royal succession (including marriage and the succession rights of women) became major political themes during the Tudor era. The House of Stuart, descended from Henry VII's daughter Margaret, came to power in 1603 when Elizabeth Idied and the Tudor line failed.
from
http://solar.physics.montana.edu
date 2017
December 02
Where were the Greeks?The Greeks were renowned for their astronomical observations, but there are few recorded observations of sun spots in the west until the 1600's; although one of the earliest of all recorded observations was by Theophrastus (374-287 B.C.) in the fourth century B.C. Part of the reason for this was because of the dominating views of Aristotle (384-322 BC) concerning the incorruptibility of the heavens. Aristotelian philosophy maintained the Sun was a perfect sphere (philosophically speaking) and without blemish. This meant that sun spots were "physically impossible", so that sightings were ignored or ascribed to transit of Mercury or Venus across the solar disk. Indeed, Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) misinterpreted a spot seen on May 18, 1607 as being exactly this. Later, "the perfection of the heavens" became part of orthodox Christian theology, similar to the belief that the earth was the center of universe and all the planetary bodies revolved around it.
image of sunspot drawing by Galileo.
http://solar.physics.montana.edu
It wasn't until the early 1600's that sun spot observations began in earnest, coinciding with the invention of the telescope. The first telescopic observation of the sun probably belongs to Thomas Harriot (1560-1621) on Dec 8th, 1610. He was one of four prominent observers at this time using telescopes to look at the sun. They were Johann Goldsmid (1587-1616, known as Fabricius) in Holland, Thomas Harriot in England, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) in Italy, and the Jesuit Christoph Scheiner (1575-1650) in Germany. Fabricius is credited with associating sun spots with the axial rotation of the sun, a view which Galileo made the convincing case for. Galileo's views on sun spots contributed significantly the sequence of events that landed him in front of the Roman Inquisition in 1633, but growing animosity on the part of the Jesuits who, in particular through their chief astronomer Christopher Clavius (1538-1612), also contributed to Galileo's downfall. [Academic jealousy is nothing new!]
After this burst of discovery and observation, sun spot observation went dormant for many years. In a letter to Humphrey Marshall dated, London, February 14, 1773, a Mr B. Franklin comments about the sun spot observations Marshall had sent him
...The observations I communicated to our astronomers of the Royal Society, who are much pleased with them, and hand them from one to another; so that I have had little opportunity of examining them myself, they not yet being returned to me.
Here are various opinions about the solar spots. Some think them vast clouds of smoke and soot arising from the consuming fuel on the surface, which at length take fire again on their edges, consuming and daily diminishing until they totally disappear. Others think them spots of the surface, in which the fire has been extinguished, and which by degrees is rekindled. It is remarkable, that, though large spots are seen gradually to become small ones, no one has observed a small spot gradually become a large one; at least I do not remember to have met with such an observation. If this be so, it should seem that they are suddenly formed of their full size; and perhaps, if there were more such constant and diligent observers as you, some might happen to be observing at the instant such a spot was formed, when the appearances might give some ground of conjecture by what means they are formed.
The professor of astronomy at Glasgow, Dr. Wilson, has a new hypothesis. It is this; that the sun is a globe of solid matter, all combustible perhaps but whose surface only is actually on fire to a certain depth, and all below that depth unkindled, like a log of wood, whose surface to half an inch deep may be burning coal, while all within remains wood. Then he supposes, by some explosion similar to our earthquakes, the burning part may be blown away, leaving bare the unkindled part below, which then appears as a spot, and only lessened as the fluid burning matter by degrees flows in upon it on all sides, and at last covers or rekindles it.
By focus on the "divine rights of kings" (without the DIVINE as making our minds up from religion) , as from the age of Enlightenment and defining the alternative "rights of kings" which has its origins in Ancient Greece and the enlightenment.
There are some basic definitions of how the Gods of Greece were kings but also gods and that the domain of gods meant , "the equal share of freedom"
as related to the "DEMOCRACY" which meant that Democracy = "in God we trust" as the example of the true values of Europe at the time of the Enlightenment
and how this may be defined in the United states of America.
So the Greek definition does not use the predefined "DIVINE" because that would imply a false rule controlled by the church and Rome, rather , the definition
of democracy where any of the Ancient Classical Greek gods may be chosen as the example of the gain of freedom by that representation.
So that when the vote goes to the center, the obvious result is the "non center" right next to it as the failure.So that the moment when the winner wins, the view of the
people with the new freedom may see the reality of what has opposed the new representation.
This view would have,in the classical view, reversed in view of how the Greek gods were related to their own faults and would have returned to one among them as the classical gods problem.So this was not visable(new definition of change) as representation in ancient Greece. So that without this reversal ,the vote and the new representation may give freedom to many more nations when it has observation by the peoples.
As democracy where All citizens share power:
Around 500 B.C.E the people of Athens decided to try governing themselves. They developed democracy, or "rule by people".
In a democracy all people share in the ruling power.Ancient Greek democracy was different from democracy today. The government of
Athens was a direct democracy. In this type of government, every citizen can vote on every issue. Unlike Athens, the United States of America is a representative democracy.
In this type of government, people vote for representatives who decide issues in their name.This defines the function of the representative to use the
example of the freedom of the gods as the freedom of the winning god, in which we trust has the representation of other freedoms or that there are other values
of freedom that may be understood. This means that the NASA "APOLLO MISSIONS" were the same type of freedom of representation in space and on the Moon.
The reality may be the same in that the relations of the GOD's of ancient Greece were bound to each other, so that to unbind them as in some direction that defined the interactions of the gods, the vote and representation defined by the vote that gains the space between as the relationships of the new freedom between them and as such may be said to be of the ATHENS type of classical democracy.
important:
So there are some Greek Gods
There are spaces between them
The spaces define their interactions
The winning presidence wins in front of the whole nation.
The NON WINNING side is observable by the nation as the loosing electorates makes his way away from the light.
This observable difference defines the thought of any of the Classical Greek Gods that wins.
So by vote and win, the thought of the god may be thought and the amount of thoughts as
represented by each president =the meaning of them( the thought may be anything and this defines
the PUPILUS UNIVERSALUS=stars, (the right to an education that has been represented of the FICTIONAL thought of, ((anything))the CONTINGENCY)
= fictional contingency and the gain of the thought becomes the "fused horizons of the winning side" as the place and height of the stature of the winner
compared to the Greek gods as the way to "OLYMPUS".
Because the APOLLO made it to the Moon, there will be missions to Mars as well that are based on the "OLYMPUS MONS" as the largest mountain in the
Solar system.
Much of this was known in the enlightenment and was defined by the Sun king as "electro magnetism".The extended thought of the Greek Gods becomes the space
in nwhcih anything peaceful may occur in space and in the universe. The main motivation for this= peaceful contact with aliens in "interplanetary space".
And many are already ambassadors to peaceful alien contact.
So that the total freedom of the Classic Greek gods representation becomes the "absolute freedom" by which the way between the classical Greek gods are linked and how this relates to the space between them as SPACE that is out there ,as interplanetary space. This may also help to understand the use of the reference point of the freedom by representation as the center of any number of gods of Classical civilization by defining the "left and right" as "true or opposite" to the freedom of the representation.
One of the main reasons why there also exists "THE GAIA MISSIONS" as from the European space agency may be because the same freedom of representation of Apollo
has the relationships of the Goddess GAIA and that the "GAIA "satellite missions are based from E.S.A as democracy of (the European space agency)looking into how the milky way was created by surveys of the stars in the galaxy.Gaia defines the reach of the representation of ESA as in the reach of the zone ,between which, the various freedoms exist to map the limitations of the Milky Way.
has the relationships of the Goddess GAIA and that the "GAIA "satellite missions are based from E.S.A as democracy of (the European space agency)looking into how the milky way was created by surveys of the stars in the galaxy.Gaia defines the reach of the representation of ESA as in the reach of the zone ,between which, the various freedoms exist to map the limitations of the Milky Way.
The Sun figures predominantly in science fiction.
Here's the scifi movie "SUNSHINE" from 2007.
Here's the scifi movie "SUNSHINE" from 2007.
Older records of science fiction figure as the winners in the definition of the Sun and the fantasy force.
Aside from there being some unknown force that defines the SUN , not many have ventured so far as to say that the SUN is some energetic biological being.
If something does not contain at least one cell, it is not alive. Fire does not contain cells. -- Living things contain DNA and/or RNA, proteins which contain the basic information cells use to reproduce themselves. Fire does not contain DNA or RNA.
from:
http://www.unimedliving.com
date 2017
December 02
Of course the stars are alive!
Many Scientists assume that stars are inanimate, senseless physical objects, as are all the other spherical units at any scale: the planets, comets, atoms and sub-atomic particles.
In contrast, the Ageless Wisdom Teachings tell us that the stars are indeed alive, conscious, intelligent beings at a level of development and responsibility we can hardly imagine. And so also are planets and particles intelligent beings with their own forms of conscious life.
If you look at any science astronomy book, website or TV show, it will discuss the birth, maturation, old age and death of the stars in the sky. It will discuss their different sizes, colours, temperatures, cycles and 'lifestyles' – how fast they burn and how their future will unfold, for instance. It sounds like stars are alive, but this is not believed.
What if the Ageless Wisdom Teachings are correct that the stars and all those other spherical units are indeed alive?
What if they are also sentient and intelligent – conscious, aware, responsive, feeling and reasoning?
How could we know or find out? Despite what scientists do already know about stars, why just assume stars are not alive or aware, without even finding out?
Surely that is a very unscientific dismissal of something that is beyond our measured knowledge?
What if when a star goes supernova, it's a mighty being changing its current form of existence by exploding and ejecting a vast volume of itself which forms and gives birth to millions of new baby stars, planets and other kinds of things in the universe? Analogous to a mother producing young from her own body (like a plant spreading seeds or animal making eggs) then being responsible for their care throughout their entire lives, this is a cycle of ‘reproduction’ on a grand, cosmic scale!
Why is it that, in spite of its meaning 'above/beyond/magnificent and new', we use the word 'supernova' to describe the death of stars instead of birth, renewal and expansion?
I find it remarkable that we humans adopt the arrogant position that we, as little organic, physical beings on Earth, consider our current way of thinking to be the 'top of the heap' regarding life, consciousness and intelligence, and that our definitions are 'it'. We assume that because the Sun doesn’t ‘talk’ to us or respond to us in a recognisable way, it’s not alive or aware. If something doesn't fit our limited definitions, and if it doesn't jump or squeak when we poke it, we decide it isn't alive or conscious or intelligent.
If a single cell in your body 'poked' you, made some move to try to get your attention, would you feel it? Would you respond? No, you'd only feel the total state and position of whole groups of cells, like your stomach or your leg. Perhaps to the Sun our human bodies are like little cells, adding up to an overall sense of the state of humanity or of Earth or of the solar system, but not cause for individualised conversation!
We do have an instrument that, when 'tuned up', is able to perceive beyond the limits of our machines and scientific measuring instruments, and that is our own bodies. When you stand outside on a clear night and look at the stars, what do you receive? I know for me the stars feel alive and aware; mighty beings with a level of intelligence and responsibility far in advance of where we are at as individual physical humans.
Just as a human physical body is a visible vehicle and reflection of the conscious 'me' that expresses through it, so the visible stars, like our Sun, are the physical expressions of great conscious beings with a scope of life, awareness and connection to the All that makes our whole busy material world seem trivial and shows us to be at odds with the rest of the universe.
It is well and truly time for us to drop our arrogance and ignorance and realise that we are absolutely bound by universal laws, and that we have a job ahead of us. That job is to evolve, ie. to return to what we truly are beyond our human bodies and this little 3-dimensional physical life we have created. When we accept evolution and commit to it, we are back on the path towards re-joining the ever-expanding universal community of stars to which we belong.
Here are some views of the universe we are in.
The Great Attractor is a gravitational anomaly in intergalactic space at the center of the Laniakea Supercluster that reveals the existence of a localised concentration of mass tens of thousands of times more massive than the Milky Way.
Zone of avoidance, region characterized by an apparent absence of galaxies near the plane of the Milky Way Galaxy and caused by the obscuring effect of interstellar dust. It was so called by the American astronomer Edwin P. Hubble. The zone of avoidanceis entirely a local Milky Way Galaxy effect.
The Sloan Great Wall (SGW) is a cosmic structure formed by a giant wall of galaxies (a galaxy filament). Its discovery was announced from Princeton University on October 20, 2003, by J. Richard Gott III, Mario Jurić, and their colleagues, based on data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey.
If something does not contain at least one cell, it is not alive. Fire does not contain cells. -- Living things contain DNA and/or RNA, proteins which contain the basic information cells use to reproduce themselves. Fire does not contain DNA or RNA.
from:
http://www.unimedliving.com
date 2017
December 02
Of course the stars are alive!
Many Scientists assume that stars are inanimate, senseless physical objects, as are all the other spherical units at any scale: the planets, comets, atoms and sub-atomic particles.
In contrast, the Ageless Wisdom Teachings tell us that the stars are indeed alive, conscious, intelligent beings at a level of development and responsibility we can hardly imagine. And so also are planets and particles intelligent beings with their own forms of conscious life.
If you look at any science astronomy book, website or TV show, it will discuss the birth, maturation, old age and death of the stars in the sky. It will discuss their different sizes, colours, temperatures, cycles and 'lifestyles' – how fast they burn and how their future will unfold, for instance. It sounds like stars are alive, but this is not believed.
What if the Ageless Wisdom Teachings are correct that the stars and all those other spherical units are indeed alive?
What if they are also sentient and intelligent – conscious, aware, responsive, feeling and reasoning?
How could we know or find out? Despite what scientists do already know about stars, why just assume stars are not alive or aware, without even finding out?
Surely that is a very unscientific dismissal of something that is beyond our measured knowledge?
What if when a star goes supernova, it's a mighty being changing its current form of existence by exploding and ejecting a vast volume of itself which forms and gives birth to millions of new baby stars, planets and other kinds of things in the universe? Analogous to a mother producing young from her own body (like a plant spreading seeds or animal making eggs) then being responsible for their care throughout their entire lives, this is a cycle of ‘reproduction’ on a grand, cosmic scale!
Why is it that, in spite of its meaning 'above/beyond/magnificent and new', we use the word 'supernova' to describe the death of stars instead of birth, renewal and expansion?
I find it remarkable that we humans adopt the arrogant position that we, as little organic, physical beings on Earth, consider our current way of thinking to be the 'top of the heap' regarding life, consciousness and intelligence, and that our definitions are 'it'. We assume that because the Sun doesn’t ‘talk’ to us or respond to us in a recognisable way, it’s not alive or aware. If something doesn't fit our limited definitions, and if it doesn't jump or squeak when we poke it, we decide it isn't alive or conscious or intelligent.
If a single cell in your body 'poked' you, made some move to try to get your attention, would you feel it? Would you respond? No, you'd only feel the total state and position of whole groups of cells, like your stomach or your leg. Perhaps to the Sun our human bodies are like little cells, adding up to an overall sense of the state of humanity or of Earth or of the solar system, but not cause for individualised conversation!
We do have an instrument that, when 'tuned up', is able to perceive beyond the limits of our machines and scientific measuring instruments, and that is our own bodies. When you stand outside on a clear night and look at the stars, what do you receive? I know for me the stars feel alive and aware; mighty beings with a level of intelligence and responsibility far in advance of where we are at as individual physical humans.
Just as a human physical body is a visible vehicle and reflection of the conscious 'me' that expresses through it, so the visible stars, like our Sun, are the physical expressions of great conscious beings with a scope of life, awareness and connection to the All that makes our whole busy material world seem trivial and shows us to be at odds with the rest of the universe.
It is well and truly time for us to drop our arrogance and ignorance and realise that we are absolutely bound by universal laws, and that we have a job ahead of us. That job is to evolve, ie. to return to what we truly are beyond our human bodies and this little 3-dimensional physical life we have created. When we accept evolution and commit to it, we are back on the path towards re-joining the ever-expanding universal community of stars to which we belong.
Here are some views of the universe we are in.
The Great Attractor is a gravitational anomaly in intergalactic space at the center of the Laniakea Supercluster that reveals the existence of a localised concentration of mass tens of thousands of times more massive than the Milky Way.
Zone of avoidance, region characterized by an apparent absence of galaxies near the plane of the Milky Way Galaxy and caused by the obscuring effect of interstellar dust. It was so called by the American astronomer Edwin P. Hubble. The zone of avoidanceis entirely a local Milky Way Galaxy effect.
The Sloan Great Wall (SGW) is a cosmic structure formed by a giant wall of galaxies (a galaxy filament). Its discovery was announced from Princeton University on October 20, 2003, by J. Richard Gott III, Mario Jurić, and their colleagues, based on data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey.
in the human figure depicted as having his or her arms stretched out it may appear in the position of the sloan great wall of galaxies as the total of every living planet in the universe trying to hold the "great Attractor" as the larger sphere in front of it as in front of the orbital around the "great attractor".Other meanings, include that we have to find our origin and why we were created with such great responsability of holding the universe together with every other planet with humanoid beings searching for and making peace in the universe.